My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00154 (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00154 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:45:57 PM
Creation date
5/1/2007 10:23:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/13/2007
Description
ISF Section - Notice of 2008 Instream Flow Recommendations and Summary of ISF Workshop
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Hydrologic Data <br />Discharge in Arapaho Creek was estimated from gage data collected from USGS gage <br />09016500 (Fig. 1) aelial apportionment.IAlthough the watershed area above USGS gage <br />09016500 is approximately 46.9 square miles, only 17.39 square miles lie above the <br />I <br />Buchanan Creek. Thus, flows through the reach above Buchanan Creek are expected to <br />be 0.37 that ofthose measured at the usbs gage. This aerial apportionment approach <br />was used to estimate daily discharge ratJs above the diversion for each day of the period <br />of record. I . <br />1 <br />Estimates of the daily discharge rates ab6ve Buchanan Creek from 10/1/44 - 9/30/71 <br />were used to calculate the average dischkrge for each day of the year (Fig 2) as well as <br />the average, minimum and maximum d~ily discharge rate for each month (Table 1). <br />These data were then used to estimate t~e percentage of days a given flow was exceeded. <br />These data indicate that, throughout the ;year, the recommended flow was exceeded by 50 <br />percent of observed daily discharges (T~ble I). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The United State Geological Survey's StreamStats tool was used generate estimates of <br />, <br />average monthly flows in Arapaho Creek (Table 2). StreamStats can be found at: <br />I <br />, <br />, <br />htto:/ /watcr. USgS.gov /osw/streamstats/ colorado. html <br /> <br />StreamStats uses regression equations to provide estimates of discharge for ungaged sites. <br />This analysis also indicated that througHout the year typical flows through the watershed <br />I <br />would exceed the recommended flows. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Precipitation Data <br />Local climate data from the Grand Lake weather station have also been attached <br />, <br />(Appendix C). <br /> <br />Existing Water Right Information <br />At one time or another, three structures held water rights in the Arapaho Creek watershed <br />that potentially could have impacted ins~eam flows along Arapaho Creek. The Arapaho <br />Creek Ditch (Structure ID Number: 511~ and the Arapahoe (sic) Ditch and Tunnel <br />System (Structure ID Number: 992) wefe both located along the main stem of Arapaho <br />Creek while the Divide Ditch No 2 (Stnicture ID Number: 997) was located along Mill <br />I <br />Creek, a tributary to Arapaho Creek (Fig I). The water rights for three of these <br />structures, however, have been abandoned. The Arapaho Creek Ditch rights were <br />abandoned in 1984, the Arapahoe Creek Ditch and Tunnel System rights were abandoned <br />in 1980 and the Divide Ditch No 2 rights were abandoned in 1981. For a more complete <br />description of these structures see the fdllowing Structure Summary Reports. <br />I <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.