Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> 15 <br /> 16 <br /> 17 <br /> 18 <br /> 19 <br />. 20 <br />21 <br /> 22 <br /> 23 <br /> 24 <br /> 25 <br /> 26 <br /> 27 <br /> 28 <br /> 29 <br /> 30 <br /> 31 <br /> 32 <br /> 33 <br /> 34 <br /> 35 <br /> 36 <br /> 37 <br /> 38 <br /> 39 <br /> 40 <br />. <br /> <br />executive Summary <br /> <br />Environmental Consequences <br /> <br />I <br />2 <br />3 <br /> <br />("balance contents"). This alternative does not include a mechanism for the storage and <br />delivery of conserved system and non-system water in Lake Mead. The existing lSG <br />would be extended through 2026. <br /> <br />ES.1.4.5 Reservoir Storage Alternative <br />The Reservoir Storage Alternative was developed in coordination with the cooperating <br />agencies and other stakeholders, primarily Western and the NPS. This alternative would <br />keep more water in storage in Lake Powell and Lake Mead by reducing water deliveries <br />and by increasing shortages to benefit power and recreational interests. This alternative <br />includes larger, more frequent shortages that serve to conserve reservoir storage; <br />coordinated operations of Lakes Powell and Mead determined by specified reservoir <br />conditions (more water would be held in Lake Powell than under the Basin States <br />Alternative); and an expanded mechanism for the storage and delivery of conserved <br />system and non-system water in Lake Mead. The existing ISG would be terminated after <br />2007. <br /> <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />II <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br /> <br />ES.2 Summary of Potential Environmental Effects <br /> <br />ES.2.1 Methodology <br />Hydrologic modeling of the Colorado River system was conducted to determine the potential <br />hydrologic effects of the alternatives. The modeling provides projections of potential future <br />Colorado River system conditions (i.e., reservoir elevations, reservoir releases, river flows) <br />for comparison of those conditions under the No Action Alternative to conditions under each <br />action alternative. Due to the uncertainty with regard to future inflows into the system, <br />multiple simulations were performed in order to quantify the uncertainties of future <br />conditions and as such, the modeling results are typically expressed in probabilistic terms. <br /> <br />The hydrologic modeling also provides the basis for the analysis ofthe potential effects of <br />each alternative on other environmental resources such as recreation, biology, and electrical <br />power. The potential effects to specific resources are identified and analyzed for each action <br />alternative and are compared to the potential effects to that resource under the No Action <br />Alternative. These comparisons are typically expressed in terms of the relative differences in <br />probabilities between the No Action Alternative and the action alternatives. <br /> <br />ES.2.2 Hydrologic Resources <br /> <br />ES.2.2.1 Reservoir Storage <br />Lake Powell. Under the No Action Alternative and the action alternatives, the elevations of <br />Lake Powell are projected to fluctuate between full and lower levels during the period of <br />analysis (2008 through 2060). At the 90th percentile Lake Powell end-of-July elevations <br />values, the action alternatives and the No Action Alternative are projected to be similar <br />over the period of analysis. <br /> <br />At the 50th percentile Lake Powell end-of-July elevation values, the action alternatives <br />and the No Action Alternative are projected to be similar during the period of 2008 <br />through 2015. During the period of2016 through 2026, the Reservoir Storage Alternative <br /> <br />Draft EIS - Colorado River Interim Guidelines for <br />Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for <br />Lake Powell and Lake Mead <br /> <br />ES-7 <br /> <br />February 2007 <br />