Laserfiche WebLink
<br />000588 <br /> <br />Mitchell (1995) identified 308 ponds -- 253 along the Colorado River with <br />a total surface area of 721 acres and 61 along the Gunnison River with a <br />total surface area of 197 acres. Mitchell reported that most of these ponds <br />were less than 5 acres in surface area. The tota 1 number . of 308 ponds <br />i nc 1 udes the Upper Colorado Ri ver from the Colorado-Utah state 1 i ne upstream <br />to Palisade, Colorado. That number does not include numerous ponds that <br />occur in the floodplain from Palisade upstream to Rifle, Colorado. There <br />are numerous ponds along the Upper Colorado and Gunnison rivers that will <br />serve as alternate feeding areas for fish-eating birds. Since nonnative fish <br />would be removed from only a small proportion of the ponds in the project <br />area in any single year (not more than 25 ponds or 8% of the 308 ponds <br />identified by Mitchell (Martinez and Nesler 1996), many other ponds would <br />still be available as alternate feeding areas. <br /> <br />In add it ion, adequate shallow backwaters of the ri vers and embayments <br />connected to the rivers contain numerous small fishes that are available to <br />bi rds that depend to a 1 arge extent on fi sh as food. These habi tats, <br />adjacent to the floodplain, would likely provide suitable alternative <br />habitats for food, cover, and nesting by various birds. Some reclaimed <br />floodplain ponds will be stocked with either young endangered fishes or <br />sportfish. Other ponds will be reconnected to the rivers as part of the <br />Recovery Program effort to restore bottoml and habi tats. Fi sh in these <br />habitats will be available as a forage base for both avian and terrestrial <br />wildlife. Reclaimed floodplain ponds that remain fishless will provide <br />larger numbers of aquatic invertebrates that are used as food by other bird <br />species such as shorebirds and waterfowl. Some ponds, formed from gravel <br />mining operations, are too deep and contain only a small area of shallow <br />water that can be used for feeding by wading birds. In the floodplain areas <br />where these ponds are located, there are numerous shallow backwaters and <br />embayments connected to the rivers containing small fish that are available <br />as food for piscivorous birds. <br /> <br />One piscivorous bird, the great blue heron, is very common in the project <br />area. Great blue heron rookeries are found in the cottonwood riparian zone <br />in floodplains along the Colorado River in the Grand Valley, in the Vicinity <br />of DeBeque, and upstream as well as downstream near Rifle (Colorado Division <br />of Wil dl i fe Database 1997). Most great blue herons are mi gratory in <br />Colorado -- birds arrive at the rookeries in late February and disperse from <br />the sites as the young fledge. Since the great blue heron feeds by wading <br />in shallow waters, many of the ponds in the floodplain (particularly those <br />remaining from gravel mining operations) are too deep for this species or <br />other wading birds to feed effectively. These birds would seek shallow <br />ponds that are natural depressions in the floodplain or other shallow <br />environments such as river shorelines, backwaters, and embayments. <br />Therefore, the impact on this common species by removal of nonnative fish <br />species from floodplain ponds should be very minimal. <br /> <br />Some fi sh that are ki 11 ed wi th rotenone wi 11 be eaten by some bi rds . <br />However, rotenone is nontoxic to birds at the concentrations used to kill <br />fish (Bradbury 1986). Therefore, no adverse" impacts are anticipated to <br />piscivorous birds that feed on dying fish because it is highly unlikely that <br />they would not eat enough of the fish killed by rotenone to cause toxicity <br /> <br />19 <br />