My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPP336
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPP336
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:11 PM
Creation date
4/23/2007 10:00:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.H
Description
Colorado River Threatened-Endangered - UCRBRIP - Program Organization-Mission - Stocking
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/4/1998
Author
DOI-FWS
Title
Management-Control of Non-Native Fish Species in Floodplain Ponds Along the Upper Colorado and Gunnison Rivers - Final Environmental Assessment-Finding of No Significant Impact - 02-04-98
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />000578 <br /> <br />2000 (C ity of Delta 1996). The popul at i on of the City of Delta is <br />approximately 4,000 with another 4,000 persons within a 5-mile radius of the <br />city. The ethnicity of the county residents in 1990 (City of Delta 1996) <br />was primarily white (89.8%), hispanic (9.1%), native American (0.5%), black <br />(0.28%), and Asian (0.23%). The per capita income of Delta County in 1993 <br />was about $16,000. Delta, Colorado was rated in the top one-third of <br />retirement communities in the United States by the Rand McNally's Places <br />Rated Retirement Guide, based on climate, housing, health care, personal <br />safety, economics, and recreation. <br /> <br />B. VeQetation and land Use. Much of Delta, Garfield, and Mesa Counties is <br />rural and remains primarily an agricultural area with hay for livestock the <br />. primary crop. The Grand Valley between Clifton and Palisade is dominated <br />by orchards and vi neyards. The ri pari an vegetat ion. in the fl oodp 1 a in <br />consists primarily of cottonwood (Pooulus fremontii), willows (Salix sp.), <br />tamarisk (Tamarix oarviflora), and Russian olive (ElaeaQnus anQustifolia). <br />In unaltered floodplains, broadleaf cattail (IYJID~'latifolia), some hardstem <br />bulrush (Schoenoolectus acustus), and sedges are the dominant non-woody <br />plants. low vegetation of adjacent uplands consists of various grasses, <br />forbs, and sagebrush. <br /> <br />Numerous ponds are the domi nant feature in. altered areas of the broad <br />fl oodp 1 a in areas of the Colorado and Gunn i son ri vers. Some are natural <br />floodplain depressions. Gravel mining in the floodplain of the Colorado and <br />Gunnison rivers in construction of Interstate Highway 70 and in commercial <br />and residential construction resulted in depressions that are filled by <br />groundwater and by irrigation return flows. Because of their close <br />proxi mi ty to the ri vers, many fl oodp 1 a in ponds become connected to the <br />rivers during years with high streamflows during the spring runoff <br />(Osmundson 1986). In addition, some of the ponds have outlets that connect <br />directly to the rivers. In either case, chronic escapement of the nonnative <br />fishes into the rivers occurs regularly. Some of the nonnative fishes do <br />not fare well in the riverine environment. However, the river serves as a <br />conduit for these nonnative fishes to occupy other suitable habitats such <br />as backwaters, embayments, and floodplain ponds. <br /> <br />Mitchell (1995) identified 308 ponds (both public and private) representing <br />878 surface acres along the Colorado and Gunnison rivers (Table 1). <br />Mitchell's inventory on the Colorado River included the reach from the <br />Colorado-Utah state line upstream to Palisade, Colorado. Many additional <br />ponds occur in the floodplain of the Upper Colorado River from Palisade to <br />Ri fl e. The number remains unknown because an inventory has not been <br />completed to date. Most of the ponds (number = 253; 721 acres) were along <br />the Colorado River and 61 ponds (197 acres) were along the Gunnison River. <br />Most of the ponds were less than 5 acres in surface area (Table 1). For <br />comparative purposes, reservoirs in the area are much larger. For example, <br />Harvey Gap Reservoir contains 196 surface acres. On the Colorado River, 73 <br />percent of the ponds are privately owned while 44 percent of the ponds on <br />the Gunnison River are privately owned (Mitchell 1995). Mitchell (1995) <br />surveyed pond owners via a questionnaire, in part, to determine the number <br />of ponds that contain fish. landowners along the Colorado River reported <br />that 32% of the ponds contained fish. landowners along the Gunnison River <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.