My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPP325
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPP325
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:11 PM
Creation date
4/23/2007 10:00:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.H
Description
Colorado River Threatened-Endangered - UCRBRIP - Program Organization-Mission - Stocking
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
11/14/1997
Author
CO Wildlife Commissi
Title
Statewide Fish Management Policy - Colorado Wildlife Commission - 11-14-97
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ul}Q546 <br /> <br />I. INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Twenty years ago, the conditions affecting fishery management were quite a bit <br />different than what the Colorado Wildlife Commission has to deal with today, or what we will <br />deal with over the next 20'years. In 1977, Colorado had about 500,000 licensed resident <br />and non-resident anglers. Total state population was only about 3 million people. The <br />Endangered Species Act was about 4 years old, and no one could foretell the influence it <br />would have on species management. The idea of special regulations on fishing waters .was <br />in the "experimental" stage. rainbow trout were the most popular fish, and species like wiper <br />and tiger.musky hadn't even been thought of by Colorado's fishery biologists. There was <br />no Pueblo hatchery, no problems with Whirling Disease, no Memoranda of Understanding <br />with the Department of Interior, and life as a whole was simpler, less busy and more <br />straightforward. <br /> <br />Today, the Colorado Wildlife Commission has to deal with over 750,000 licensed <br />anglers, a burgeoning state population pushing 4 million people, Recovery Programs for <br />state and federally listed native fish species; procedures on when and where warmwater <br />sport species can be stocked in specific drainages; where fish exposed to fish health <br />problems can and cannot be stocked; and how to fund extremely complex basin <br />management practices that involve the public, municipalities, water users, developers, <br />agricultural interests, anglers and environmentalists. Colorado's aquatic habitat is clearly <br />under greater threat from expanded development and demand for water. Natural resource <br />management as we come to the close of this century has evolved considerably and takes <br />place in a new political environment that reflects shifting public desires and expectations. <br />Public participation is gauged in terms of citizen referendum, stakeholder groups, angler <br />roundtables and intense public involvement in agency decisions. <br /> <br />In the spirit of the Colorado Division of Wildlife's Legislative mandate, the Colorado <br />Wildlife Commission has prepared a new STATEWIDE FISHERY MANAGEM.ENT POLICY <br />that takes into account this changed environment for natural resource management, and <br />which provides direction to the Division of Wildlife for fishery management programs into the <br />next century. <br /> <br />Colorado's fish and aquatic resources are a key component of the environment of Colorado <br />and are highly valued by the people of this state. The Division of Wildlife has management <br />responsibility for over 70 species of fish in Colorado, of which 7 are native sport species, <br />32 are introduced sport species, and 32 are native, non-sport species. Populations of these <br />species occur throughout the 24,000 miles of stream habitat, 15,000 acres of natural lakes, <br />and 250,000 acres of man-made reservoirs, lakes and ponds. The environmental, <br />recreational, social, cultural and economic benefits provided by healthy fish populations <br />contribute greatly to the quality of life in the state. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.