Laserfiche WebLink
<br />oui}487 <br /> <br />. Coordinate with and seek: the support and participation of the many local governments, <br />org~ions, and interests which could be significantly affected by these efforts; <br /> <br />· Establish agreements" with appropriate federal agencies to secure their support for the <br />implementation of necessary research, planning, and actions; and <br /> <br />. IdentitY potential funding and seek broad public support for implementation of the <br />indicated actions. . <br /> <br />An important threshold issue if a native species conservation partnership approach were to move forward <br />is where to focus initial efforts. While some coordinated and consistent statewide efforts would seem <br />important, the two Departments suggest that initially resources should be targeted around current high <br />priority concerns. For example, ongoing South Platte River resource management issues may suggest <br />a focussed pilot project effort in that basin. <br /> <br />The roles that would be played by the agencies of DNR and DPHE with respect to fostering native <br />aquatic species conservation partnerships are anticipated to fall principally into the categories of technical <br />assistance, coordinatio~, and facilitation. As one example, it would be important for these agencies to <br />develop compatible software to maximize the oppOrtunities for data sharing that would support these <br />conservation partnerships. It is anticipated that if the need is sufficient to support these conservation <br />partnerships, the interaction between these agencies would be further defined in an inter-agency <br />Memorandum of Understanding. <br /> <br />L <br />~ <br /> <br />ci <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br />.. <br /> <br />6. NEXT SfEP <br /> <br />This Draft Concept Paper is being circulated broadly in the hope of initiating a dialogue regarding what <br />DNR and DPHE believe to be an extremely important environmental and.nanuaJ. resources management <br />issue facing Colorado today. The proposed aPProach represents one {)Ossible response to this issue. <br />However, any response will ultimately be successful only if there is a shared consensus that it is the <br />appropriate.way to proceed. Therefore, the two Departments are seeking input from the full spectrum <br />of persons interested in these issues to determine whether the suggested approach, or something like it, <br />is worth pursuing. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />l! <br /> <br />As a first step in further exploring the issue of declining aquatic species and the viability of the possible <br />responses presented in this Draft Concept Paper, the members of the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board, the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission, and the Colorado Wildlife Commission will <br />conduct a Public Workshop, scheduled for March 15, 1995. The Public Workshop should provide an <br />opportunity both to explore the basic idea of partnerships to protect native aquatic species, and to begin <br />to identify specific actions that might be pursued if decisions are made to proceed. <br /> <br />Over the next several weeks, the two Departments will be seeking public input to better define the content <br />of the Public Workshop. If you have suggestions, please contact Doug Robotham at the Colorado <br />Department of Natural Resources, 1313 Sherman Street, Denver, Colorado, 80203. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />f: <br /> <br />5 <br />