My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPP303
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPP303
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:11 PM
Creation date
4/23/2007 9:59:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.H
Description
Colorado River Threatened-Endangered - UCRBRIP - Program Organization-Mission - Stocking
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
7/25/1995
Author
CWCB
Title
Colorado Non-Native Aquatic Species Protection Workshop - Summary - 07-25-95
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />000431 <br /> <br />. Others. <br />. De-facto coordinated flow management. <br />. Instream flow program. <br /> <br />, <br />f <br />~ <br />. <br /> <br />Missing resources. tools. information and partnerships: <br /> <br />. Clear definition of watershed management. <br />. Database/information transfer. <br />. Integrating water quality/quantity database. <br />. Conflict between quality/quantity statues <br />. Lack of partnership although pieces exist. <br />. Trust factor at local/state/federal levels (county commissioners). <br />. Education on how land use can affect water resources. <br />. Basin management authorities. <br />. Mandates for non-point source pollution. <br />. Consequences of not organizing. <br />. Big picture - biological. <br />. Incentives. <br /> <br />I~ <br /> <br />Possible actions to achieve desired results: <br />. More local partnerships at watershed levels. <br />. Increase education. <br />. Develop an integrated management approach with existing technology. <br />. Local authority, who, what and how. <br />. Big picture for data collection and analysis. <br />. User friendly data. <br />. Incentives for watershed management. <br /> <br />li <br /> <br />~ <br />iOi <br />" <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Additional Comments: <br /> <br />. Colorado Water Quality Forum's work on common data structure provides guideline <br />for what If data If is needed to begin watershed management. <br /> <br />2) Common Vision <br /> <br />Workshop participants identified the need for a common vision. Participants indicated the <br />effort should be based on, Ifa shared vision that has clear goals that are identifiable, realistic, <br />achievable, broadly based, ecosystem emphasis, monitoring accountability, bottom-up public <br />support and with stakeholder empowerment. If <br /> <br />Existing resources. tools. information and partnerships available to achieve desired <br />results: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~,o: <br /> <br />. Strong public interest in native species. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.