My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPP287
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPP287
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:10 PM
Creation date
4/23/2007 9:58:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.49.J
Description
Colorado River Threatened-Endangered - RIPRAP - Price-Stubb Fish Passage - Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/1/2004
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact - RE- Providing Endangered Fish Passage at the Price-Stubb Diversion Dam on the Colorado River - 12-01-04
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001087 <br />Final Environmental Assessment-Chapter 3-Affected Environment and <br />Environmental Consequences <br /> <br />Pacific Railroad, E.R. Jacobson and CDOT. The whitewater features would include <br />public access below the dam obtained by the Town of Palisade via an existing dirt road <br />through the Union Pacific Railroad and E.R. Jacobson properties. The dirt road is <br />accessed from North River Road (Old Highway 6). The features could also be accessed <br />from Colorado River State Park-Island Acres upriver. Restrooms, kiosks, and other <br />amenities may be constructed in the future with non-recovery program funds as funding <br />becomes available. These additional recreation features are not included in any of <br />Reclamation's alternatives and are discussed further in the cumulative impacts section of <br />this chapter. <br /> <br />If non-Recovery Program funding were not available, or permits, easements and <br />authorization not obtained; Reclamation would construct the 2.5 percent riprap ramp <br />without whitewater features as described in the Downstream Rock Fish Passage <br />Alternative (see Page 12). <br /> <br />Impacts <br /> <br />No Action: Ifno action is taken, the Price-Stubb Diversion Dam would remain a <br />dangerous barrier to river navigation, and portaging around the dam would involve <br />trespassing. River recreation would continue to increase, and local boating enthusiasts <br />and BLM predict significant growth of river recreation and day use. Increased <br />recreational boating is expected to occur whether or not any action is taken to provide <br />fish passage at the Price-Stubb Diversion Dam. However, the opportunity to extend the <br />river corridor upstream to Island Acres would be diminished. The river would not be a <br />means to connect Colorado River State Park sites in the area and Colorado River State <br />Parks-Island Acres would remain isolated from the other downstream parks. <br /> <br />Conventional Fish Ladder: As with the No Action alternative, construction of a <br />fish ladder around the dam would provide no recreation benefit. <br /> <br />Downstream Rock Fish Passage: This alternative would provide an established <br />portage around the diversion dam on river-left but would reduce the likelihood of <br />additional recreation enhancements occurring in the future at the site. This alternative <br />would address boating safety issues with warning signs posted upstream of the dam and <br />install a log boom or similar-type barrier upstream of the fish passage exit to prevent <br />boaters from attempting to float through the fish passage. The fish passage channel and <br />riprap ramp would not be safe for boat passage and boaters, but the riprap ramp would be <br />safer than the existing conditions. Boaters would be encouraged to portage around the <br />dam. Unauthorized access to the river from Interstate 70 and the Cameo Bridge may <br />occur, however it is not predicted to increase as a result of construction of the <br />Downstream Rock Fish Passage Alternative. <br /> <br />Future recreational enhancements funded with non-Recovery Program funds could <br />improve the remaining portion downstream of the dam as long as it did not interfere with <br />the operation and structural integrity of the fish passage. However, future recreational <br />enhancement would likely be cost prohibitive because of additional costs associated with <br /> <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.