Laserfiche WebLink
<br />00097~ <br /> <br />Status and Distribution <br /> <br />Colorado pikemi~ow were historically distributed throughout warmwater r~aches of the <br />Colorado River Basin .from Wyoming and Colorado south to the Gulf of California. By the <br />1970s they were extirpated from the entire lower basin (downstream of Glen Canyon Dam) and <br />from portions ofthe upper basin as a result of major alterations to the riverine environment. <br />Having lost some 75-80 percent of its former range, the Colorado pikemiim'Ow was federally <br />listed as an endangered species in 1967 (Miller 1961, Moyle 1976, Tyus 1991, Osmundson and <br />Burnham 1998). <br /> <br />Colorado pikeminnow are presently restricted to the Upper Colorado River Basin and inhabit <br />warmwater reaches ofthe Colorado, Green, and San Juan Rivers and associated tributaries. The <br />species inhabits about 350 miles ofthe mainstei:n Green River from its confluence with the <br />Colorado River upstr~am to the ~outh of the Yampa River. In the Yampa River, its rap.ge <br />extends upstream an additional 160 miles. Colorado pikeminnow also occur in the lowermost <br />104 miles of the White ~ver, another tributary to "the Green River. In the mainstem Colorado <br />River, distributit>uofthe species extends 201 miles upstream from the upper end of Lake Powell <br />to Palisade, Colorado (Tyus 1982). <br /> <br />Major declines in Colorado pikeminnow populations occurred during the dam-building era of the <br />, 1930s through the 1960s. Behnke and Benson (1983) summarized the decline of the natural <br />ecosystem, pointing out that dams, impoundments, and water use practices drastically modified <br />the river's natural hydrology and channel characteristics throughout the Colorado River Basin. <br />Dams on the mainstem broke the natural continuum of the river ecosystem into a series of <br />disjunct segments, blocking native fish migrations, reducing temperatures downstream of dams, <br />creating lacustrine habitat, and providing conditions that allowed competitive and predatory <br />nonnative fishes to thrive both within the impounded reservoirs and in the modified river <br />segments that connect them. The highly modified flow regime in the lower basin coupled with <br />the introduction of nonnative fishes decimated populations of native fish. <br /> <br />Major declines of native fishes first occurred in the lower basin where large dams were <br />constructed from the 1930s through the 1960s. In the upper basin, the following major dams <br />were not constructed until the 1960s: Glen Canyon Dam 'on the mainstem Colorado River, <br />Flaming Gorge Dam on the Green River, Navajo Dam on the San Juan River, and the Aspinall . <br />Unit Dams on the Gunnison River. To date, some native fish populations irithe Upper Basin <br />have managed to persist, while others have become nearly extirpated. River segments where <br />native fish have declined more slowly than in other areas ire those where the hydrologic regime <br />most closely resembles the natural condition, where adequate habitat for all life phases still <br />exists, and where migration corridors are 'unblocked and allow connectivity among life phases. <br /> <br />In the mainstem Colorado River, the magnitude of spring flows has declined by 30-45 percent <br />since the early part of the century (Osmundson and Kaeding 1991,. Van Steeter 1996, Pitlick et <br />al. 1999). Such flow reduction negatively affects Colorado pikeminnow in four ways: <br /> <br />6 <br />