My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPP286
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPP286
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:10 PM
Creation date
4/23/2007 9:58:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.45.J
Description
Colorado River Threatened-Endangered - RIPRAP - Red Lands Project-Fish Ladder - Enviro Studies
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
5/1/2004
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact - RE- Redlands Power Canal Fish Screen - 05-01-04
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />000972 <br /> <br />irrigation season (April- October) approximately 70 cfs is pumped up 120 feet to the <br />shareholder's service area. When fish enter canals they are lost from the river, either by being <br />injured or killed in hydropower turbines or by being transported to irrigated lands. Therefore, <br />the Recovery Program in cooperation with R WPC is proposing to install a fish screen in the <br />Redlands Canal. The RWPC would assume ownership of the fish ladder and fish screen, and be <br />responsible for the operation and maintenance of the screen. The Service would continue to <br />operate the fish ladder. The Recovery Program will provide funding to RWPC to maintain the <br />fish ladder and operate and maintain the screen. An agreement among R WPC, Reclamation, and <br />the Service outlines the responsibility of each party in regards to the proposed fish screen and <br />existing fish ladder (Appendix A). This agreement facilitates the transfer of ownership from <br />Reclamation to R WPC. The Recovery Program identified the construction and operation of a <br />fish screen at the Redlands Canal as a necessary"action in their Recovery Action Plan: <br /> <br />The proposed fish screen will be configured in a "V" shape in the canal with each leg of the <br />screen 160 feet long. The screen is designed for a total diversion flow of 890 cfs, with 40 cfs <br />returning fish and debris back to the Gunnison River. The fish return pipeline will be a 36-inch <br />diameter PVC pipe approximately 460 feet long. A bypass chanriel would be constructed around <br />the section of the canal where the screen would be placed. ~e purpose ofthe bypass channelis <br />to have the ability to continue to operate the canal if the screen is not functioning because of <br />iCing, clogging, 'mechanical failure, or other reasons. Gates will be 'installed in the canal to direct <br />flows either into the fish screen'or into the bypass canal. <br /> <br />Water depletions associated with RWPC's operations include an average annual diversion from <br />the Gunnison River of734 cfs or 503,429 acre-feet. Approximately 490,410 acre-feet of water is <br />returned to the Colorado River downstream of the Gunnison and Colorado River confluence <br />below the power plant tailrace 4.5 miles downstream of the confluence. Approximately 7 cfs is <br />delivered to properties along the Gunnison River with return flows to the Gunnison of <br />approximately 3.5 cfs. In addition, 63 cfs is pumped and delivered to properties up on the <br />Redlands. Water depletions associated with irrigation are approximately 11,737 acre-feet/year. <br /> <br />This large diversion from the Gunnison River significantly reduces flows under certain <br />hydrologic conditions in the lower 2.3 miles ofthe Gunnison River and several miles ofthe <br />Colorado River below the confluence. RWPC holds a very senior water right, which provides <br />, water for endangered fish in the Gunnison River down to their point of diversion. Also, the large <br />return flow to the Colorado River below the power plant contributes flow to critical habitat. The <br />overall water depletion below the tailrace return on the Colorado River is approximately 11,737 <br />acre- feet/year. <br /> <br />Conservation Measures <br /> <br />Conservation measures are actions that the action agency and applicant (Redlands" Water and <br />Power) agree to implement to further the recovery of the species under review. The beneficial <br />effects of conservation measures were taken into consideration for determining jeopardy, adverse <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.