Laserfiche WebLink
<br />000952 <br /> <br />Amercian robin (Turdus migratorius), European starling (Sturn us vulgaris), Western <br />meadowlark (Sturnella neglecta), Brewer's blackbird (Euhagus cyanocephalus), house finch <br />(Carpodacus mexicanus), house sparrow (Passer domesticus), masked shrew (Sorex cinereus), <br />Western small-footed myotis (Myotis californicus stephensi), long-legged myotis (Myotis volans <br />interior), hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus cinereus), .desert cottontail (Sylvilagus audubonii), black- <br />tailed jackrabbit (Lepus californicus), white-tailed jackrabbit (Lepus townsendii), least chipmunk: <br />(Tamias minimus), Northern pocket gopher (Thomomys talpoides), Ord's kangaroo rat <br />, (Dipodmys ordii sanrafaeli), deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus), house mouse (Mus <br />musculus), common muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus), coyote (Canis latrans), long-tailed weasel <br />(Mustelafrenata), striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis), bobcat (lynx rufus), mule deer (odocoileus <br />hemionus), tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum), Woodhouse's toad (Bufo" woodhousii <br />woodhousii), bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana), and Northern leopard frog (Rana pipfens) (CDOW <br />2002). <br /> <br />Common fish species in the Gunnison River include blue head sucker (Catostomus discobolus), <br />tlannelmouthsucker (Catostomus latipinnis), roundtail chub (Gila robusta), common carp <br />(Cyprinus carpio linnaeus), fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas), red shiner (Cyprinella . <br />lutrensis), sand shiner (Noptropis stamine'us), and channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) (Burdick, <br />2001). ' <br /> <br />No Action: The No Action alternative would have no effect on terrestrial wildlife <br />species and canal entrainment of common fish species would continue with unscreened <br />diversions. <br /> <br />Proposed Action: Local wildlife would likely be temporarily displaced and avoid the <br />project area during construction. Construction would occur outside the nesting season, and long- <br />term effects are predicted to be negligible. Re-v~getation of disturbed areas using riparian <br />species would also assist in minimizing effects to local wildlife. Operation and maintenance of <br />the fish screen would be beneficial to common fish species. Canal entrainment would be . <br />minimized and screened fish would be returned to the Gunnison River. <br /> <br />THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES <br /> <br />Reclamation formally consulted with the Service under the Endangered Species Act regarding <br />construction and operation of the Redlands Fish Screen. A copy of the Service's biological <br />opinion is attached in Appendix A. Informal consultation identified the following threatened and <br />endangered species which may occur within the project area: <br /> <br />Common Name <br />Colorado pikeminnow <br />razorback sucker <br />humpback chub <br /> <br />Scientific Name <br />Ptychocheilus lucius <br />Xyrauchen texanus <br />Gila cypha <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />Status <br />Endangered <br />Endangered <br />Endangered <br />