Laserfiche WebLink
<br />000950 <br /> <br />Impacts <br /> <br />No Action: The No Action alternative would have no effect on existing vegetation or <br />current land uses. <br /> <br />Proposed Action: The fish return pipeline would disturb about I acre of riparian <br />vegetation owned by R WPC with grubbing and trenching. This would result in the loss of <br />approximately 10 mature cottonwood trees. Afterconstruction, the area would be re-vegetated <br />with cottonwood and willow plantings and appropriate riparian grasses. Fifty cottonwood and <br />willow seedlings (5 to I ratio) would be planted in the area and tamarisk would be removed to <br />mitigate for the loss of the 10 mature cottonwood trees. A 50-ft. corridor (25 feet on each side of <br />the pipe) would be maintained to protect the pipe and allow for access for maintenance of the <br />fish return outlet structure. The O&M contract between Reclamation arid R WPC would address . <br />long-term control of tamarisk and noxious weeds within the fish return pipeline easement. <br /> <br />Reclamation would request authorization from the Army Corps of Engineers under Regional <br />General Permit No. 57, Projects beneficial to the Colorado River endangered fishes, for the <br />construction of the fish screen. The fish return pipeline outlet structure would require discharge <br />of concrete and fill material; however no jurisdictional wetlands would be affected. No changes <br />in land use are predicted as a result oft~e proposed action. <br /> <br />FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES <br /> <br />Existin2 Conditions: The affected area, for the purposes of assessing fish and wildlife, <br />corresponds to the 100 year floodplain of the Gunnison River from the Redlands Diversion Dam <br />to the Gunnison River's confluence with the Colorado River. There are no significant concerns <br />for project effects on fish and wildlife resources in general; concerns focus on avoiding and <br />minimizing adverse impacts to endangered species as well as complementing efforts to establish <br />self-sustaining populations of endangered CQlorado River fish species. . <br /> <br />Riparian habitat along the Gunnison River.support diverse wildlife populations. Similar riparian <br />habitats along the Colorado and Gunnison rivers support both resident and migratory wildlife <br />species and these species are also likely to occur within the project area (Reclamation, 2003b). <br /> <br />Common terrestrial species at Walter Walker SW A along the Colorado River include Northern <br />sagebrush lizard (Sceloporus graciosMs grciosus), Northern whiptail (Cnemidophorus tigris <br />septentrionalis), gopher snake (Pituophis catenifer), great blue heron (Ardea herodias), Canada <br />goose (Branta canadensis), mallard (Anas platyhynchos), rock dove (Columba livia), mourning <br />dove (Zenaida macroura), common nighhawk (Chordeiles minor), black-chinned hummingbird <br />(Archilochus alexandri), tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor), black-billed magpie (Pica pica), <br /> <br />15 <br />