My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPP283
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPP283
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:09 PM
Creation date
4/23/2007 9:58:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.39.C
Description
Colorado River Threatened-Endangered - RIPRAP - CFOPS - Water Availability
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
9/1/2003
Author
Brown and Caldwell
Title
Phase 2 Coordinated Facilities Water Availability Study for the Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River - Final Report - 09-01-03
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />000780 <br /> <br />The interim agreements take 5,412.5 acre-feet from Williams Fork Reservoir and <br />5,412.5 acre-feet from Wolford Mountain Reservoir with options to go to Ruedi <br />Reservoir under certain conditions. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />6,000 acre-feet of reservoir storage space in Wolford Mountain Reservoir to benefit <br />endangered fish habitat pursuant to the Wolford Mountain Reservoir Biological <br />Opinion. Protection of releases of this water is accomplished pursuant to the terms of <br />the Wolford Mountain Reservoir Biological Opinion and an agreement among the <br />River District, CWCB and the Service. <br /> <br />Up to an estimated 28,400 acre-feet of water on an average annual basis resulting from <br />construction of improved water management features for the Grand Valley Water . <br />Management Project. This project consists of adding seven new check structures to <br />the canal system, automation of the checks and other structures, construction of the <br />1,000-foot Palisade Pipeline and the construction of the Highline Lake Pumping <br />Station. Much of this water will exist and be managed as surplus Historic User Pool <br />(BUP) water in Green Mountain Reservoir. <br /> <br />Legal protections for delivery of surplus HUP water and water made available by the <br />Grand Valley Water Management Plan will be accomplished in two phases. <br /> <br />1. Protect water up to the capacity of the Grand Valley Power Plant pursuant to <br />the Orchard Mesa Check Setdement. This water is protected by a contract <br />agreement, which will ensure its delivery to the Orchard Mesa Power Plant and <br />. u __. tbeheadof tbe15",Mile Reach.afteuelease from Green Mountain Reservoir. <br /> <br />2. Additional legal mechanisms to protect surplus HUP water in excess of <br />paragraph (1) above will be developed and will be available for enhancement of <br />flows in the 15- Mile Reach as a result of the Grand Valley Water Management <br />Project. In order to work within the confines of State of Colorado water law, a <br />municipal recreation contract with the City of Grand Junction, City of Fruita <br />and Town of Palisade has been entered into. This contract would protect <br />releases of surplus water from the Green Mountain HUP in excess of the <br />capacity of the Orchard Mesa Power Plant to and through the 15-Mile Reach <br />for municipal recreational purposes. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1.3.2 Spring Peak Enhancement <br /> <br />CROPS is a voluntary program that coordinates operations and bypasses of water from various <br />water facilities to enhance flows to the 15-Mile Reach during the peak spring runoff period. The <br />Recovery Program implemented CROPS in 1997 and augmented spring peak flows by <br />approximately 2,000 cfs in that year; in 1998, CROPS added approximately 2,400 cfs to the peak and <br />in 1999 an estimated 2,500 cfs was added to the peak (Smith and Wilson, 1999). No CROPS <br />activities were conducted in 2000 and 2001 due to low snow pack and concerns about reservoir <br />storage, although a peak in the range of 13,500 cfs did occur in 2000 because of rapid snow melt. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />P: \Data \ GEN\ CWCB\ 19665\Report Phase 2\FinaIReport9.03\Final_ CFOPS_Report(9-03) .doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.