Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. n-'" 87 <br />\Julio. <br /> <br />2. A mainstem dam and reservoir could be constructed at the Webster Hill site, located <br />immediately downstream from Rifle, which could provide the 20,000 acre-feet <br />releases in the required years and perhaps even result in a profit from generation of <br />hydropower. This alternative has two apparently fatal flaws which make it <br />unacceptable to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and environmental interests: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />It's a dam and reservoir and <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />It would inundate designated Critical Habitat for the Endangered Species of <br />fish. <br /> <br />Based on our four years of working on this project, and the results achieved during this four-year <br />period, the Consultant Team believes that there is some version of the "Share the Pain" alternative <br />coupled with some version of the Insurance Pool alternative that can meet the Fish and Wildlife <br />Service's goal of releasing/bypassing 20,000 acre-feet on to the spring peak hydro graph in those <br />years when the peak flow of the Colorado River at Palisade is between 12,900 cfs and 26,600 cfs <br />without unacceptably: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Reducing existing projects' yields, <br />Increasing existing projects' operations and maintenance costs, or <br />Affecting existing projects' operational flexibility and/or reliability. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Based on review of the comments, however, the Consultant Team believes that before the <br />Executive Committee can effectively develop a recommendation from the CFOPS study, it will first <br />have to seek agreement on several important concerns that surfaced in the comments. These <br />concerns include: <br /> <br />10 Is making a CFOPS release voluntary or mandatory? If an agency has agreed to take <br />part in the CFOPS effort and if an agency has responsibility for making some <br />release/bypass from one of the agency's reservoirs, is this release/bypass voluntary <br />or mandatory? <br /> <br />2. Are CFOPS releases/bypasses subordinate to CROS? Or, are CROS bypasses <br />subordinate to CFOPS releases/bypasses? <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Do the results of the numerous simulations produced with the original and modified <br />StateMod and the five versions of the C1 Data Set provide adequate and sufficient <br />basis for developing a workable CFOPS recommendation? The Study Team has <br />concluded that the answer to this question is, "yes," but some additional Ground <br />Rules may have to be developed, however. <br /> <br />4. The Consultant Team has concluded that the 1975-91 hydrologic study period <br />provides adequate and sufficient basis for developing a workable CFOPS <br />recommendation. Again, however, some additional Ground Rules may need to be <br />developed. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />P: \Data \GEN\CWCB\19665\Report Phase 2\ Technical Memorandum No. 12\ TechMemo12.2.28.03.doc <br /> <br />2 <br />