My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPP282
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPP282
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:09 PM
Creation date
4/23/2007 9:57:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.39.C
Description
Colorado River Threatened-Endangered - RIPRAP - CFOPS - Water Availability
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/1/2003
Author
Brown and Caldwell
Title
Phase 2 Coordinated Facilities Water Availability Study for the Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River - Tech Memo Number 12 - Comments-Responses to 01-01-03 - Draft - 03-01-03
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />uOlJ7{~9 <br /> <br />the head of the 1S-Mile Reach or approximately 29,000 cfs at the Cameo USGS gage (Coordinated <br />Reservoir Operations Group, 1999 and personal communication from George Smith to.Leo Eisel and <br />Sue Uppendahl, January 2000). The upper limit, 26,600 cfs, is based to some extent on downstream <br />flooding considerations and is not totally habitat based. The Service has the objective of increasing the <br />frequency of occurrence of flows greater than 12,900 cfs. The Service has identified target flows in the <br />1S-Mile Reach in the range of 12,900 to 26,600 cfs because flows of this magnitude have been shown <br />to mobilize gravel cobble substrate (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, December 20,1999). The Service is <br />not interested in increasing the peak when the actual peak or augmented peak is likely to be less than <br />12,900 cfs or greater than 26,600 cfs.The Service would like to see as much as possible of the average <br />annual 20,000 acre-feet made available during the 7 to 10 day period surrounding the peak spring <br />discharge. <br /> <br />The Service has indicated that the 20,000 acre-feet will bedetennined as an average annual volume <br />(Smith and Muth, July 1999). In years when flows in the Colorado River at the top of the 1S-Mile <br />Reach are less than 12,900 cfs or greater than 26,600 cfs, no water will be provided. For those years <br />when the flow is between 12,900 and 26,600 cfs, an average of 20,000 acre-feet will be provided, i.e., in <br />some years more than 20,000 acre-feet will be provided, and in some years less. <br /> <br />With some alternatives it may be possible to carry over unused water to the next year for purposes of <br />meeting the average annual 20,000 acre-feet target in that year. <br /> <br />If some portion of the average annual 20,000 acre-feet remains after augmentation of the spring peak <br />discharge and this water can not be carried over for use in the succeeding spring, this water may be <br />used for augmenting low flows during the July 15 through October 31 period. Augmentation oflow <br />flows in late summer and fall is second priority to augmenting the spring peak discharge during the 7 <br />to 10 day spring peak period. <br /> <br />The following characterize the low flow target: <br /> <br />. During the July 15 through October 31 period, the goal will be to maintain minimum <br />flows at the head of the 15-Mile Reach as specified by the Service (U.S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service, May 1995). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />During years of above average precipitation (i.e., precipitation greater than the <br />50th percentile), efforts would be made to maintain flows at or around 1,630 cfs. <br /> <br />During years of low precipitation (i.e., precipitation less than the 50th percentile), <br />efforts would be made to maintain flows at or greater than 1,240 cfs. <br /> <br />During drought years (the lowest 20th percentile), efforts would be made to maintain <br />flows at or greater than 810 cfs. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Service has indicated the following priorities concerning when diversions to storage would be <br />made (Smith and Muth, July 1999): <br /> <br />1. Winter, <br />2. Descending limb of the spring runoff hydrograph, and <br />3. Ascending limb of the spring runoff hydrograph. <br /> <br />P: \Data \GEN\CWCB\19665\Report Phase 2\FinaIReport12,02\Final_ Draft _ Report(1-Q3),doc <br /> <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.