Laserfiche WebLink
<br />00u712 <br /> <br />West Slope Comments <br /> <br />Executive Committee should make the call on this. <br /> <br /> <br />first fill right. <br /> <br /> <br />Ref. pg 39 Section 3.3.3 para 2 The ground rules include the provision that yield shall not be <br />adversely impacted. The analyses do not show an impact to yield in GMR, GR/CBT or WFR <br />from having lower storage levels carry over between years. The report should note that while <br />lower levels are carried over the reservoirs the analyses never show a reduction in deliveries or <br />yield. Noted - correction will be made. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />. Ref. pg. 40 Section 3.403 For the modified share the pain alternative, where GR/CBT, GMR and <br />WFR contribute 6,667 acre feet each, described in this section a table of contributions (like that <br />shown in Table 11) should be generated. Is GMR participation limited by the analyses limiting <br />releases to the turbine capacity? Noted - correction will be made. <br /> <br />~l <br />II <br /> <br /> <br />The only year in which the 20,000 acre-feet release was required and Green Mountain Reservoir <br />s;ould not make the total 20,000 acre-feet by itself due to limited release capacity was 1985 (see <br />T'!Q!~_~}-:- Th~_~as~J?ig~~~!:..Yt::2-!:~~~~L~aseline.!elea~~_Q..f 1 04,j]_0~~re- feet. rhe <br />Executive Committee would need to review this situation and determine what its policy would <br />be in situations such as this. <br /> <br />P:\Data\GEN\CWCB\19665\Report Phase 2\Technical Memorandum No. 12.\Appendix B.doc <br /> <br />20 <br />