Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OOJ7(j7 <br /> <br />West Slope Comments <br /> <br />Elimination of the Shoshone Call - use of resulting stored water savings and increased diversions <br />to storage for later release <br /> <br />The utilization of an insurance pool was included in the discussion and presumably part of any <br />alternative. <br /> <br />Your understanding of the feasible alternatives is correct. <br /> <br />Specific Comments <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />Ref. pg. 3, No.8 line 3 should read "...four times..." <br /> <br />Editorial comments are noted and will be addressed in the revision of the draft report. <br /> <br /> <br />This is an <br />accurate statement. We agree, the problem is caused by limited physical availability in some <br />y~ar~ <br /> <br /> <br />Response: This a legal <br />guestion. This was not modeled with a junior decree; it was modeled with existing refill rights. <br /> <br /> <br />No water in addition to those amounts s ecified in the <br />ge~an~ fil~ wa~ divert_ed an(t'p,g!!!Q~(Ub!-2_l,!ghjh~ AQ~ms_I.1!@~-Ih9-~g.~!!!and amounts <br />were provided to the State for the original Cl data set by NCWCD. It is unknown if "Non- <br />Charge" water was included in those original demand fileso <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />Ref. pg. 7, para 1 Xcel has advised that removal of the Shoshone Call is not an option for <br />consideration for CFOPS and has insisted that all references to Shoshone be removed from this <br />report and other documentation. If this is not achievable based on these comments I will so <br />advise Xcel so they may take whatever action they deem necessary. Excerpt from Xcel <br />communication: <br /> <br />P:\Data\GEN\CWCB\19665\Report Phase 2\Technical Memorandum No. I 2\Appendix B.doc <br /> <br />15 <br />