WSPP282 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

000397 Burec A2 Comments 12) Section 2.308, page 23, change the last sentence as follows, "The necessity and frequency of obtaining such a junior water right must be determined..."o Noted - correction will be made. 13) Section 2.3.11, page 24, change the last sentence ofthe first paragraph in this section as follows, "The units are not normally worked on at the same time thus maintaining capacity to deliver water through at least one unit."o Noted - correction will be made. 14) Section 2,3.13, page 25 & 26, Second bulleted paragraph: The heading for this paragraph should read "Division 5 Fill". If it is necessary to add more definition of what that means, the following could be added "or reservoir fill as against all water rights in the basin except those of Denver Water and Colorado Springs as adiudicated in the Blue River Decrees" Similarly, the first bulleted paragraph on page 26 should read "Blue River Decree Fill" or if further definition is needed, the following may be added "or reservoir fill as against the rights of Denver Water and Colorado Springs as adjudicated in the Blue River Decrees." Noted - correction will be made. Noted - additional clarification will be added to final re ort 16) Section 2.3.13, page 26, Fourth full paragraph: Suggest the first sentence be reworded as follows: "Power releases made under the direct flow power right are debited in the accounting against the "Blue River Fill" specified in the Blue River Decrees which define the obligations of Denver Water and Colorado Springs in relationship to Green Mountain Reservoir." Noted- correction will be made. 17) Section 3.3.2, page 39, second full paragraph, Figure 14 actually indicates that less water was released from Ruedi Reservoir under the GMR 20kAF Release than the Revised StateMod and Cl Data Set (Fifth Revision) baselineo Therefore the assertion that reduced HUP Surplus availability was made up from Ruedi Reservoir appears to be erroneous. Noted - correction will be made. I 18) Section 3.4.1, page 39, last paragraph, the reference to Figure 3 in third sentence of this paragraph should be changed to "Figure 30". Additionally, it appears that Figure 32 actually indicates that releases from Ruedi Reservoir are reduced under the Revised StateMod and C 1 Data Set (Fifth Revision) with 110kAF Future Demand than the Revised StateMod and Cl Data Set (Fifth Revision) baseline. Therefore the assertion that reduced HUP Surplus availability was made up from Ruedi Reservoir again appears to be erroneous. Noted - correction will be made. 19) Section 3.405, page 41 and 42, while the modified Share the Pain Alternative With CROP Alternative appears to be feasible with perfect hindsight, in actual practice it would be very problematic to determine the allocation of the 20,000 acre-foot releases presented in Table 11 under real time operationso This limitation should be acknowledged. Noted - will be acknowledged.It would also be interesting and informative to develop comparison graphs ofthe Modified Share The Pain Alternative With CROP and 11 OkAF Demand and Revised StateMod P:\Data\GEN\CWCB\19665\Report Phase 2\Technical Memorandum No. 12\Appendix B.doc 5