My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC185
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPC185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:03 PM
Creation date
4/22/2007 10:30:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.766
Description
Colorado River Basin - Gunnison River General Publications-Correspondence-Reports
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/1/2001
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
Gunnison Basin Water Demand Study - Estimate of New Depletions for the Period 2000-2050 - Preliminary Study Results-Subject to Change - 04-01-01
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />')'-36 <br />nO!..,J <br /> <br />· Exports of water from the lower basin to supply the city of Grand Junction were <br />estimated by city staff. These exports will be a 100% depletion from the basin. <br /> <br />Methodology for Mining, Snowmaking, BLM Stock ponds: <br /> <br />· The estimate of additional mining use was taken from: <br />· For the Upper Basin: The only identified increase is likely to come from the <br />Mount Emmons area near Crested Butte. A 1997 report by W.H. Wheeler <br />estimated 1,530 acre-feet of additional depletion. <br /> <br />· For the Middle Basin: awaiting info from the BLM/USFS EIS on future North <br />Fork coal mining development. <br /> <br />· The estimate of additional snowmaking is based on a master development plan for <br />Crested Butte's expansion to Snodgrass mountain. This document estimated an annual <br />21.3 at depletion. <br /> <br />· The estimate of BLM stock pond depletions was derived from 6 historical years (1995 _ <br />2000) of stock pond and spring development projects. The total new depletions reported <br />over those 6 years were used to develop an average annual value which were multiplied <br />by 50 years to arrive at a total figure of 400 acre-feet for the entire basin. This value was <br />equally distributed into the 3 sub-basin for purposes of this study. <br /> <br />Anticipated Refinements yet to be completed/or this study: <br /> <br />· In order to better estimate of the percent of county population in each sub-basin, analyze <br />the demographers information -on total county population vs uriJan areas; verify estimates <br />with appropriate county planners. . (See method in Helton & Williamsen report) <br /> <br />· Contact SEO for estimates of stock or other pond depletions. Determine if these and <br />BLM numbers really reflect new depletions or are just replaCing old ones, i.e., is the <br />livestock population growing creating additional stockwatering needs? <br /> <br />· Review the variation in amount of per capita use in various geographic areas to determine <br />whether area-specific values should be used. Obtain monthly distribution values from <br />other M&I water suppliers and for other categories of water use. <br /> <br />· Adjust population projections for seasonal fluctuations (e.g., use 25% in some locales- <br />number from East River area 201 studies). <br /> <br />Other possible refinements: <br />· Assume growth rates other the state demographers' numbers. <br /> <br />Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.