My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC183
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPC183
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:02 PM
Creation date
4/22/2007 10:30:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.766
Description
Colorado River Basin - Gunnison River General Publications-Correspondence-Reports
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
7/23/2001
Author
Unknown
Title
Meetings-Conference Calls 2001-2002 - RE-Colorado River Basin - Gunnison River - Aspinall-Management-Biology Committees-Etc - Reviewed-Drafts - 07-23-01 through 09-06-02
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />002478 <br /> <br />Biology Committee Conference Call <br />Tuesday, October 23 <br />10:00 am to 12 noon <br /> <br />Attendees: Gerry Roehm, Pat Nelson, George Smith, Tom Czapla, Paul Dey, Tim Modde, Tom <br />Chart, John Carron, John Hawkins, Bill Davis, Chuck McAda, Ron Brunson, Mark Wieringa, <br />Mike Hudson, Amy Cutler, David Truman, Tom Pitts, Brent Uilenberg, <br /> <br />1. Review of scopes of work to evaluate escapement from Elkhead and Starvation <br />reservOIrs. <br /> <br />Starvation Scope of Work: <br /> <br />Dam operators do not want anything placed in the chutes; spillway is probably not a very <br />safe place for sampling; Dam Operation Policy - nothing in the chutes or the spillway that <br />would impact flow. The stilling basin below the spillway is too deep (60 feet) to <br />effectively sample. Using the stilling basin would require lines to pull nets up, which <br />would be difficult. If there is no feasible way to sample in chutes or off dam, could a <br />blocking net be placed in the stream below the stilling basin to prevent migration into or <br />out of the stilling basin during runoff? If so, the stilling basin could be drained before <br />runoff and again after runoff to determine how many fish had escaped from the reservoir. <br />>Tom Chart to contact operators for any flexibility in chute policy to allow for sampling. <br />>Ron Brunson to contact Gordon Mueller for how they sampled off Aspinall Unit dams. <br /> <br />John Hawkins had concerns about the evaluation, specifically what is the level of <br />escapement considered to be a problem and what is the minimum size of fish we should <br />be sampling. The latter will dictate the type and mesh size of sampling gear to be used. <br />John wants to make sure that sampling and subsequent data analysis adequately addresses <br />our needs. We should identify those life stages (i.e., sizes) to be captured and select gear <br />and develop sampling protocols accordingly. It isn't necessary to sample for eggs and <br />larvae, but juveniles should be collected. Encourage Ron to sample with a variety of gear <br />to capture as many sizes as possible. >Ron will modify the scope of work based on <br />information from dam operators and Mueller modifying methodologies as necessary to <br />achieve, as closely as possible, the original objectives of the study, Information should <br />be received within the week and will be posted to the listserver. <br /> <br />Elkhead Scope of Work: <br /> <br />Mark Wieringa wanted to know what happens to fish that are collected; Gerry responded <br />that they will probably go back into the reservoir, but they definitely would not be <br />released into the river. However, scope of work must be specific in this regard; fish <br />captured below the dam should be marked and released back into the reservoir. Chart <br />questioned if channel catfish were to be included in translocations from the river to the <br />reservoir. With regard to the variance to the NNSP requested by CDOW, the Service <br />agreed only to translocating smallmouth bass from the Yampa River into Elkhead <br />Reservoir but had significant reservations about translocating northern pike or channel <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.