My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC138
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPC138
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:15:56 PM
Creation date
4/22/2007 10:24:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.44.L
Description
CO River Threatened-Endangered - RIPRAP - Green Mountain-Grand Valley-Orchard Mesa - Reports-Data-Et
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
8/14/2002
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
Reudi Reservoir Agreements to Offset HUP Shortages at Green Mountain Reservoir - Finding of No Significant Impact and Environmental Assessment - 08-14-02
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />liJJ533 <br /> <br />Proposed Action (BUP Releases) <br /> <br />Grand Valley. Releases made through the proposed agreement would supply needed irrigation to <br />complete growing late season row crops and provide irrigation to overwinter orchards and vineyards. <br />Because the HUP is still anticipated to be short several thousand acre-feet of water this year, some crop <br />losses would still be expected, but the impacts would be considerably less under this alternative than <br />under No Action. <br /> <br />Roaring Fork Valley. Some impacts to the Basalt area economy would be anticipated due to both the <br />degraded recreation experience at Ruedi Reservoir and the above 250 cfs flows in the Fryingpan River. <br />The 250-300 cfs flows in the Fryingpan may limit or degrade fishing, although this may not be substantial <br />given the relatively small increment over 250 cfs that is anticipated. Nevertheless, the Proposed Action <br />may result in losses of recreation visitors and revenues derived from visitors' purchases. However, <br />effects of low water levels at Ruedi Reservoir are expected to be only slightly more than under the No <br />Action alternative. <br /> <br />Net Effects <br /> <br />The Proposed Action would provide needed water to sustain irrigated crops in Mesa County but may also <br />have a minor negative impact on the Basalt area economy, beyond that anticipated under No Action, due <br />to impacts on recreation. <br /> <br />HYDROPOWER PRODUCTION <br /> <br />Affected Environment <br /> <br />The City of Aspen is licensed by FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) to operate a <br />hydropower facility at Ruedi Dam and Reservoir. The FERC license recognizes that Aspen's hydropower <br />production objectives are subordinate to other uses but allows Aspen to generate electricity with any <br />flows resulting from operation of the reservoir. <br /> <br />Aspen's facility has a maximum design capacity of approximately 300 cfs. However, based on <br />information from High Country Engineering who operates the plant, equipment limitations make it <br />undesirable to operate the plant at flows in excess of 250 cfs. Releases above 250 cfs bypass the facility. <br />Similarly, the power plant is not able to operate with flows less than 40 cfs (High Country Engineering., <br />2001) <br /> <br />No Action Alternative <br /> <br />Ruedi releases are expected to be less than 250 cfs though the late summer and early fall months. <br />Consequently, releases would not exceed the hydropower plants capacity, so Aspen would be able to <br />make full use of the releases. <br /> <br />Because winter flows are anticipated to be the lesser of 39 cfs or reservoir inflows, the plant is not <br />anticipated to be able to operate during the months of November to March. <br /> <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.