My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC128
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPC128
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:15:53 PM
Creation date
4/22/2007 10:23:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.39.L
Description
Colorado River Threatened-Endangered - RIPRAP - CFOPS - General Reports-Maps-Data-Etc
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
8/31/1999
Author
Unknown
Title
Revised Discussion Paper - Accounting for Consumptive Uses Under the Programmatic Biological Opinion - Colorado River Mainstem - 08-31-99
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />000342 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />be added to the Recovery Action Plan according to standard procedures, <br />outlined in that plan. .if the Recovery Program is unable to complete those <br />elements which the Service has determined to be required for the second 60,000 <br />acre-feet/year, consultation on projects with a Federal nexus may be reinitiated <br />in accordance with Endangered Species Act regulations and this opinion's <br />reinitiation requirements. " <br /> <br />2) Annually, the Service and the State will jointly collect consumptive use data and other <br />data necessary to update either the states CRDSS Consumptive Use Model or the states <br />CRDSS Colorado River Mainstem Water Right Planning Model Cl run. Data collected <br />would include irrigated acres (perhaps updated only every 5-years so that costs can be <br />shared with Reclamation's CU&L report), climatic data needed to run the "Modified <br />Blaney-Criddle" consumptive use model, as well as data on evaporation, municipal and <br />industrial uses, and other consumptive uses identified in Bureau of Reclamation's <br />consumptive uses and losses report. If the C I model run is used, this would include <br />updated demand data for "back casting" purposes. <br />3) Annually, or at a predetermined time interval like every 5-years, run the consumptive use <br />model or updated Clmodel and develop a consumptive use and losses report. This report <br />would verify that total consumptive uses have not increased on average by more than the <br />appropriate trigger amount (60,000 or 120,000 acre-feet) over the 1975-1995 base period. <br />4) In order to avoid potential problems associated with annual fluctuations do to variable <br />climatic factors, as well as model and data changes, all determinations of increases in <br />consumptive use will be made using the long-term averages since 1975. Assuming the <br />CRDSS Colorado River Mainstem Water Right Planning Model is used, two model runs <br />will be required. First, Cl for the entire updated study period (e.g. 1975 to year (n)) at <br />1995 demand levels will be required. Second, a new CI (call it C2) for the same updated <br />time period using year (n) demand levels "backcasted" over the period is required. <br />Comparing the difference between the long-term averages of the two model will identify . \ <br />the increase in consumptive use over that time period. Model calibration and verification t.. f.fJ.4r r-e.Vft~t:P} <br />will be done with each update. There are no "CAP" amounts identified in this process, <br />the trigger is whether or not the difference between the two model runs exceeds either <br />the 60,000 acre-foot or 120,000 acre-foot trigger. <br />5) The report will be prepared on a water year basis. The report will document any changes <br />made to the model such as updated demand information. <br />6) The report will be completed by July I st of each year if done annually or within 6-months <br />of the close of a more infrequent reporting period. <br />7) This process as currently envisioned has the potential to become labor intensive <br />depending on the number of model changes and degree of "backcasting" involved. Costs <br />or appropriate cost-share arrangements will be worked out during the development of the <br />Recovery Programs annual work plan. Furthermore, because of cost considerations, the <br />process identified above is subject to change with the agreement of the program <br />participants through the current management process. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.