My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC112
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPC112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:15:50 PM
Creation date
4/22/2007 10:21:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.49.J
Description
Colorado River Threatened-Endangered - RIPRAP - Price-Stubb Fish Passage - Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/19/2004
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
Revised Supplemental Draft Environmental Assessment and Notice of Public Meeting - RE- Providing Endangered Fish Passage at the Price-Stubb Diversion Dam on the Colorado River - 04-19-04
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />!,?, q '.', !~'" 3 <br />UUJ..lhJ' <br />Revised Supplemental Draft Environmental Assessment-Chapter I-Introduction <br /> <br />site (known as the Jacobson Hydro No.1 Project). The project was put on hold in 1994, <br />and has not been constructed. FERC amended the Jacobson Hydro No.1 license in <br />September 2001 (FERC,2001). The amendment included the means to reimburse the <br />licensee for the cost of the fish passage. The maximum amount of the reimbursement <br />was the anticipated cost of the least cost passage alternative. The license was terminated <br />by FERC on July 15,2002 (FERC 2002C). Reclamation's implementation offish <br />passage at the Price-Stubb Dam was dependant on FERC's decision on the amendment <br />and/or the licensee's decision to proceed with hydropower development. The licensee <br />has not abandoned plans for hydropower development at the site. <br /> <br />,Scope <br /> <br />Reclamation developed fish passage alternatives and identified issues or concerns with <br />participation from many individuals, agencies, and organizations that may be affected by <br />the project. Alternatives discussed in Chapter 2 are: No Action, Conventional Fish <br />Ladder, Downstream Rock Fish Passage, Downstream Rock Fish Passage with <br />Whitewater Recreation Features, and Dam Removal. This Revised Supplemental <br />Draft EA refines the Downstream Rock Fish Passage Alternatives that were evaluated in <br />the Supplemental Draft EA (Reclamation, 2002a). <br /> <br />Water Resources <br /> <br />Ute Water Conservation District (Ute Water) Pump Plant Intake-Ute Water <br />provides domestic water to over 60,000 Grand Valley residents via a pipeline from <br />storage reservoirs. Their emergency backup water supply is pumped from the Colorado <br />River out ofthe pool formed by the Price-Stubb Diversion Dam. Dewatering upstream of <br />the dam or dam removal could adversely affect Ute Water's ability to pump water from <br />the river during low river flows. <br /> <br />Water Rights-Owners of existing water rights with points of diversion at the Price- <br />Stubb Diversion Dam have raised issues regarding potential impacts and the future <br />utilization oftheir water rights under the Dam Removal Alternative. <br /> <br />Clifton Water District-Downstream Water Quality-Changes in water quality <br />downstream from the dam may affect the ability of Clifton Water to meet drinking water <br />standards and provide domestic water to approximately 30,000 people. <br /> <br />Ute Water Pump Plant-Spring Flooding-the fish passage alternatives may affect <br />spring flooding of the Ute Water pump plant. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.