Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OUIG34 <br /> <br />Revised Supplemental Draft Environmental Assessment-Chapter 3-Affected <br />Environment and Environmental Consequences <br /> <br />Conventional Fish Ladder: As described in the No Action, constructing a fish <br />ladder around the diversion dam would not change the existing safety hazard. <br /> <br />Downstream Rock Fish Passage: This alternative would reduce the safety <br />hazard with signage and installation of log boom type barrier upstream of the fish passage <br />exit to prevent boaters from attempting to float through the fish passage. <br /> <br />Downstream Rock Fish Passage with Whitewater Recreation Features: This <br />alternative would further reduce safety hazards with the construction of whitewater <br />features by providing defined routes for novice and experience boaters. Non-Recovery <br />Program funding would be used to construct these features. Recreational interests would <br />maintain the whitewater features, remove debris, and address other safety issues as they <br />anse. <br /> <br />Dam Removal: Removal would eliminate the dam safety hazard. After removal <br />ofthe dam, the river channel would be typical of similar sections ofthe Colorado River. <br />All protruding rebar would be removed from the remaining concrete. Riprap would be <br />placed at each abutment to eliminate any vertical concrete faces. The riprap would create <br />sloped surfaces similar to the river banks upstream and downstream ofthe abutments. <br /> <br />In conjunction with dam removal, one of the mitigation measure options for protecting <br />the ability of Ute Water to pump from the Colorado River (see Page 19) would be <br />implemented. Option 1 and 2 would have no effect on recreation. However, designs for <br />option 3, which involves constructing a low head dam immediately downstream from the <br />pump plant, would consider boater safety. <br /> <br />Land and Facility Resources <br /> <br />During construction of any of the action alternatives, an increase in noise and traffic <br />would occur. To date, Reclamation has not been advised of concerns for disturbances <br />during construction. Any complaints would be resolved on a case-by-case basis. The <br />Colorado Department of Transportation has advised Reclamation that access to the site <br />from Interstate 70 would not be granted. <br /> <br />Protecting Existing Structures <br /> <br />The fish passage project could affect four existing structures in the project area; 1) the <br />Union Pacific Railroad on the right bank of the river, 2) the Interstate 70 Highway on the <br />left bank, 3) the Ute Water pump plant, and 4) the Colorado River Siphon located about <br />3,600 feet upstream from the dam. The Interstate, railroad, and siphon were built <br />considering river flow and stream bank conditions that existed with the dam in place. <br />Reclamation constructed the siphon, which is a pipeline under the riverbed of the <br /> <br />35 <br />