My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC112
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPC112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:15:50 PM
Creation date
4/22/2007 10:21:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.49.J
Description
Colorado River Threatened-Endangered - RIPRAP - Price-Stubb Fish Passage - Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/19/2004
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
Revised Supplemental Draft Environmental Assessment and Notice of Public Meeting - RE- Providing Endangered Fish Passage at the Price-Stubb Diversion Dam on the Colorado River - 04-19-04
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001683 <br /> <br />CHAPTER 3-AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND <br />ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES <br /> <br />General <br /> <br />This chapter discusses resources that may be affected by actions take'n to provide fish <br />passage at the Price-Stubb Diversion Dam. During preparation ofthis'Supplemental <br />Draft EA, information on issues and concerns was received from affected water users, <br />resource agencies, private interests, recreational interest groups and citizens, and other <br />parties (see Chapter 4, Consultation and Coordination, for further details). <br /> <br />For each resource, the potentially affected area and/or interests are identified. For <br />significant issues, existing conditions are described, and impacts expected under the No <br />Action alternative and each passage alternative is discussed. Impacts under the fish <br />passage alternatives are usually similar for most resources. Where there are differences, <br />the alternatives are discussed separately. The chapter concludes with a summary <br />comparison of the alternatives and a list of mitigation measures. <br /> <br />The project is in Mesa County, Colorado along the Colorado River. Mesa County has a <br />population of approximately 110,000. Grand Junction, the largest city in the area, was <br />founded in 1881. The Rio Grande Railroad extended into the area in 1882 and, soon <br />afterward, major irrigation of the valley began. The Price-Stubb Diversion Dam was <br />completed in 1911. It was used to divert irrigation water to lands in the east end of the <br />valley until 1918, when Reclamation's Grand Valley Project Diversion Dam an<'- the <br />Government Highline Canal were constructed. Although agriculture remains important <br />in the valley today, some light manufacturing and service industries influence the <br />economy. Tourism is also a significant source of economic activity for the area. The <br />project area is within a major transportation corridor, with the Union Pacific's railroad <br />tracks along the right bank of the river and the Interstate 70 highway on the left bank. <br /> <br />The upstream extent of the area affected by the fish passage proposals, and other, <br />endangered fish recovery activities for the Upper Colorado River, is the Town of Rifle in <br />Garfield County. Rifle has around 5,500 residents involved in agriculture, oil and gas <br />development, and services. Streamflows and floodplain habitat of the river have been <br />significantly altered by water diversions and uses, infringement by railroads, gravel <br />operations, highways and bridges, and by the operations of upstream storage reservoirs, <br />flood control dikes and channelization. <br /> <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.