Laserfiche WebLink
<br />n n.o; ,,",' 7 <br />uC,lOU <br /> <br />Revised Supplemental Draft Environmental Assessment-Chapter 2-Alternatives <br /> <br />No Action <br /> <br />Under the No Action alternative, Reclamation would not take action to provide for <br />endangered fish passage at or around the Price-Stubb Diversion Dam. The dam would <br />remain in place and continue to be a barrier to upstream passage for endangered fish <br />specIes. <br /> <br />The No Action alternative assumes development and operation of the Jacobson Hydro <br />No.1 Project, as licensed on September 13,2001, would not occur (FERC, 2001). This <br />40-year license was originally issued to E.R. Jacobson for the construction, operation, <br />and maintenance of the project by FERC on June 19, 1990 (FERC, 1990). <br /> <br />In 1994, FERC granted a 'stay" on development of the hydropower project for several <br />reasons. These included the need to reinitiate consultation with the Service on the effects <br />of the project on the newly listed razorback sucker and recently designated critical habitat <br />upstream from the project. On June 27, 1996, the licensee filed an application for <br />amendment of the license. Major provisions of the amendment included moving the <br />hydroplant upstream to the toe ofthe dam and decreasing the hydroplant flow from 2,000 <br />cubic feet per second (cfs) to 1,000 cf~. <br /> <br />FERC (2002a) issued a letter dated January 4, 2002 to E.R. Jacobson that stated since <br />deadlines had passed to commence project construction, Mr. Jacobson should refrain <br />from any land-disturbing or land-clearing activities at the project site. On June 3, 2002, <br />FERC (2002b) issued a notice, pursuant to Section 375.308(f) of the Commissions <br />regulations, of probable termination of the license for Jacobson Hydro No.1 Project after <br />30 days from the date of the letter. An order terminating the license was issued by FERC <br />(2002c) on July 15, 2002. Additional details about the Jacobson Hydro No. 1 Project are <br />included in the 1999 Draft EA (Reclamation, 1999). E.R. Jacobson has not abandoned <br />plans for hydropower development at the site. <br /> <br />Conventional Fish Ladder <br /> <br />Under this alternative, Reclamation would construct a ladder around the dam, similar to <br />the U-shaped ladder (see Figure 2) constructed in 1996 at the Redlands Diversion Dam <br />on the Gunnison River (Reclamation, 1995). Fish passage use by Colorado pikeminnow <br />and razorback sucker has been documented at the Redlands Fish Ladder by the Service. <br />This alternative would be compatible with private development ofthe Jacobson Hydro <br />No.1 Project, as licensed in the 2001 FERC License Amendment (FERC, 2001) if <br />independently constructed. This license was terminated by FERC (2002c) in July 2002. <br /> <br />If independently constructed, it could complicate construction of both the hydropower <br />plant and fish ladder. For instance, if the fish passage is constructed first, it would need <br />to incorporate attraction flows. If the fish passage and hydropower plant were <br /> <br />8 <br />