My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC58
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPC58
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:15:38 PM
Creation date
4/22/2007 10:13:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.400.21
Description
Colorado River Litigation - State, Division 4 Water Court Cases - Steamboat RICD
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
9/16/2005
Author
CWCB
Title
Staffs Revised Recommended Findings of Fact and Recommendations for the RICD Application by the City of Steamboat Springs, Case No 6-03CW86, September 16, 2005
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~J13 4 <br /> <br />timing, location, and manner in which the State of Colorado will be able to <br />maximize beneficial use of Colorado's water resources. The Board makes <br />the following findings about this RICD for rafting and canoeing: <br /> <br />1. The Board finds that there are probable future upstream junior <br />appropriations for direct diversion or storage. Examples are specifically <br />described in the pre-hearing statements filed by the Staff ofthe CWCB, <br />and the Upper Yampa River Water Conservancy District, the Town of Oak <br />Creek, and the other parties to this case. The RICD may affect the timing, <br />location and manner in which the State of Colorado will be able to <br />maximize beneficial use of Colorado's water resources. Thus, the Board <br />finds that the RICD proposed decree for rafting and canoeing, on balance, <br />do not promote maximum utilization. <br />11. The Board finds that there are probable future changes, transfers, or <br />exchanges of water rights from points of diversion downstream of the <br />reach affected by the RICD to points upstream of or in the reach affected <br />by the RICD. Thus, the RICD may affect the timing, location and manner <br />in which the State of Colorado will be able to maximize beneficial use of <br />Colorado's water resources. Thus, the Board finds that the RICD <br />proposed decree for rafting and canoeing, on balance, do not promote <br />maximum utilization. <br />111. The RICD for rafting and canoeing should not be denied because of any <br />federal policies, regulations and laws affect or will be affected by the <br />RICD. <br />IV. The Board finds that the proposed RICD appropriation for rafting and <br />canoeing does not promote maximum utilization of Colorado's water <br />resources because the Applicant has failed to use a reasonable means to <br />use, divert, capture and control the water for a RICD for rafting and <br />canoeing, so as to minimize its call upon the river and avoid waste. <br />v. The Board finds that there is not reasonable demand for rafting and <br />canoeing activities sought for this time period at the flow rates specified. <br />VI. a. The Board finds that the application has appropriate limitations <br />upon the time of day. <br />b. However, the Board finds that the application does not have <br />appropriate limitations on the days per month, and seasons during <br />which the RICD would be exercised for rafting and canoeing. The <br />RICD may affect the timing, location and manner in which the <br />State of Colorado will be able to maximize beneficial use of <br />Colorado's water resources. The Board finds that the RICD <br />proposed decree for rafting and canoeing, on balance, do not <br />promote maximum utilization. <br />V11. a. The flow rate of the proposed RICD may affect the timing, <br />location and manner in which the State of Colorado will be able to <br />maximize beneficial use of Colorado's water resources. The <br />Board finds that the RICD proposed decree for rafting and <br />canoeing, on balance, do not promote maximum utilization. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.