My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC54
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPC54
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:15:38 PM
Creation date
4/22/2007 10:13:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.400.21
Description
Colorado River Litigation - State, Division 4 Water Court Cases - Steamboat RICD
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
11/23/2003
Author
Christine Metz
Title
Many in South Routt County Alarmed over Water Rights - Steamboat Pilot and Today
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The Steamboat Pilot: Many in South Routt County alarmed over water rights ~) U 12 G 3 <br /> <br />PILOT .~ <br />7 ,TODAY <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Weather <br /> <br />h." 140 Partly <br />.~ Cloudy <br /> <br />Current conditions <br />7 day forecast <br />Community <br />Calendars <br />Reader Forum <br />Groups & Clubs <br />Find a new home <br />Sections <br />Front page <br />Classifieds <br />Public Notices <br />News <br />Sports <br />Milestones <br />Viewpoints <br />Style <br />Outdoors <br />The Record <br />Business <br />Real Estate News <br />Arts & Entertainment <br />South Routt <br />West Routt <br />Education <br />Women of Northwest <br />Colorado <br />Special Sections <br />Election Results <br />Election Coverage <br />Wedding Guide <br />The Venue <br />Health Care <br />Assistance <br />Search <br />Subscriptions <br />Contact <br />Advertising <br />About the Pilot & <br />Today <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Page 1 of4 <br /> <br />II Find your dream home in _... .'. <br />t:tOcuY\h^~t' _. .' . I <br />Real Estate I Reader Forum I Classifieds I Contact <br /> <br />Archived stories <br /> <br />~. Email ~ Printe.. I'C.i!l Email <br />I.c::::.I Story W:3 Friendly w:;;w Edito.. <br /> <br />Many in South Routt County alarmed over <br />water rights <br /> <br />By Christine Metz. Staff Reporter <br />SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2003 <br /> <br />"YAMPA IS WILD" WAS ONCE a slogan found on bumper stickers stuck to <br />the back of trucks and Subarus driving in Steamboat Springs. <br /> <br />It's a slogan that City Councilman Ken Brenner would like to keep true, and its <br />message is part of the reason he is pushing for the city to acquire water rights <br />that would sustain the levels of the Yampa River. <br /> <br />"We would be hard-pressed to find a river in the United States that is still as <br />close to its original hydrographic flow," Brenner said. "(Recreational water <br />rights) could mean a truly functioning river so that our children's grandchildren <br />will see the river the way our grandparents did." <br /> <br />The Yampa might be wild, but the struggle over who controls its water rights <br />could get even wilder. <br /> <br />The water rights the city is looking to file, which are classified as recreational <br />instream channel diversions, have much of South Routt County alarmed. <br /> <br />In October, the City Council stated its intent to file for water rights by the end <br />of the year. That direction has not changed, City Manager Paul Hughes said <br />Thursday. <br /> <br />Recreational water rights would preserve in-stream water flows in the Yampa as <br />it goes through downtown Steamboat, where the city has spent more than <br />$100,000 in river improvements. <br /> <br />Supporters of recreational water rights say it is a way to sustain river activities <br />for fly fishing, tubing and kayaking, even when future development farther up <br />the river calls for more water. <br /> <br />Municipalities and landowners upstream fear a recreational water right for the <br />city would place an immediate call on the river, limit any future growth and <br />could cost thousands of dollars in legal fees. A call can occur when a senior right <br />is invoked. <br /> <br />Mike Holloran, who has practiced water law in Colorado for more than 30 years, <br />said the city's filing for recreational water rights might have the same effect <br />that growth caps had on Boulder. <br /> <br />The Yampa River is under-appropriated, meaning the amount of water rights <br />filed have never been enough to require a call on the river. If the city files for a <br />water right that would be sufficient enough to keep its kayaking and tubing <br />courses functioning through the summer, a great majority of the river's water <br />rights would be taken, Holloran said. <br /> <br />Existing water rights then become more expensive, and future growth becomes <br />practically impossible, he said. <br /> <br />http://www.steamboatpilot.comlsectionl archive/story/2043 8 <br /> <br />!Story se. <br />More se, <br /> <br />".''; <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Marketpla <br />Rea I Estat, <br />I Condomini <br /> <br />Autos: <br />I Recreation <br />Em 10 me <br />Clerical Oft <br /> <br />Rentals: <br />I Homes <br /> <br />More class <br />Submit a ( <br />Find a hon <br /> <br />11/28/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.