Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />rt <br />~ <br />n <br />r <br />i:l <br />rt <br />t- <br /> <br />slate line," PhlUlps said. "There are no other <br />diversions belween here and Lake Powell. <br />You lell me where the water Is going." <br />Phillips bought his 40 acres on R Road In <br />1997. He Installed a $10,lkXI sprinkler system <br />The fanners who use the affected washes probably aren't aware that the water they and plans to grow oats, then alfalfa. He said <br />- Perslgo, Little Salt, Big Salt, East Salt. had come to rely on will be kept In the CoI~ he stands to lose at least $4O,lkXI next year If <br />HlgWlne and Badger - will be len dry be- rado River to help endangered fish In the the dam project proceeds because his crops <br />cause Colorado water law stipulates a water "IS-mile reach" between Palisade and will bum In the late summer heat. I> <br />right on wastewater In a wash doesn't exist Grand Junction. . Phillips said even thotigh he has an a oq <br />If the wastewater Isn't there, water officials Phillips said the needs of the Cannen lute water'rlght on East Salt Creek, he w ~ <br />said. have not been considered, Instead of being neverconiactedabouttheproject. ~ <br />Few, If any, of the affected fanners were designed to help endangered fish. he said, . The Bureau of Reclamation. though, wen ~ <br />contllcted about the project. saId Lynn Phil. the pllln Is a ploy to send as much Colorado through an environmental assessment pro- t-l <br />lips, a Mack farmer who pulls water from River wlllcr ll~ po~sible 10 downslrellm cess to produce the Grand Valley Water rt <br />East Salt Creek. states. Management Plan approved last September. m <br />Phillips said a water assessment map he "The roller dam at Palisade Is the last dl. <br />has indicates at lea~t 154 other farmers \'c..~lon ix'tween Grand Juncllon and the See DIVERSION, page 6A ~ N <br />t- <br />El <br /> <br />-, <br /> <br />WESTERN COLORADO'S <br />CHRONICLE OF RECORD <br />SINCE 1893 <br /> <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />s <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ay <br />Highlitw Canal water would protedfish <br /> <br /> <br />FEBRUARY 21, 1999 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Diversion m <br /> <br /> <br />A federal plan to divert water from the <br />Government Hlghllne Canal for endangered <br />fish survival In the Colorado River wID the Grand Valley Water Users Association, <br />leave some Grand Valley fanners' crops to bar 28,lkXI acre.feet annually _ equal to <br />high and dry In the late summer. more than 9.1 billion gallons _ from enter. <br />Those fanners have relied on water Ing the 55-mlle.long canal during August. <br />spilled out of the canal and Inlo six washes Seplember and October. The water will be <br />between Grand Junction and Ihe Utah slale kept In the river to ensure endangered fish <br />line as a supplempntal source for their between Palisade and Grand Junction have <br />crops. enough waler to survive. <br />The majority of IhOSP splll~ will be elll"l. The problem Is that farmers along the <br />nall'd as pari of 11/1 $8 million check-dam washes. who Weren't ('lIglhll) for cann! wa. <br />project apPl'Oved lasl September hy Ihe II.S. tel', have relied on spillover frum the canal <br />Bureau of Reclamation. for 70 years, said Bob Nonnan, project team <br />The Pl'Oject will allow the canal operalol' leader for Ihe Bureau of Reclamallo". <br /> <br />RECEIVED <br />FEB 2 6 1999 <br /> <br />~orado Water <br />..-ervation Board <br /> <br />IIJ C. PAlIICI ClEARY <br />lheballrSenllnlf <br /> <br /> <br />Vol. 106, No. 94 <br />66 pages <br />$1 newsstand <br /> <br />1 <br />'''- <br />