Laserfiche WebLink
<br />..:e~~. ...... <br /> <br />- <br />. <br /> <br />REPLY TO <br />ATTENTION OF <br /> <br />DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY <br />u.s. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO <br />CORPS OF ENGINEERS <br />1325 J STREET <br />SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814-2922 <br /> <br />April 15, 1997 <br /> <br />RECEIVED <br />APR 2 1 1997 <br /> <br />Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board <br /> <br />Regulatory Branch (199775119) <br /> <br />Mr. John R. Fetcher, Secretary <br />Upper Yampa Water Conservancy District <br />Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80488-0339 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Fetcher: <br /> <br />_I am responding to your -letter dated April 1~ 1997 <br />. concerning the construction of a new irrigation diversion <br />facility on Elkhead Creek northeast of Craig, Colorado. The new <br />facility would replace another irrigation facility on the creek <br />which has been rendered useless due to a channel change. The <br />property is in Section 28, Township 7 North, Range 89 West, Routt <br />County, Colorado. The proposed work is known as the Smith Ditch <br />Project (the project) . . <br /> <br />As alluded to in your letter, the discharge of dredged and <br />fill material associated with constructing or maintaining <br />irrigation ditches is generally exempt from regulation under <br />Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and therefore, does not <br />require authorization from the Corps of Engineers. This <br />exemption includes discharges for facilities which are <br />"appurtenant and functionally related to irrigation ditches." <br />Examples include siphons, pumps, headgates, wingwalls, weirs, and <br />diversion structures. However, the Corps can require a permit <br />for such discharges under the "recapture clause" found in the law <br />and our regulation. <br /> <br />Any discharge of dredged or fill material in waters of the <br />United States, such as Elkhead Creek, incidental to an "exempted" <br />activity must have a permit if it is part of an activity whose <br />purpose is to convert an area of waters to a new use, and where <br />the flow or circulation of waters may be impaired or the reach of <br />such waters may be reduced. If a discharge will result in <br />significant discernible alterations to flow or circulation, we <br />presume that flow or circulation may be impaired. <br /> <br />Specifically regarding the Smith Ditch project, I do not <br />have sufficient information to confirm that your proposed work is <br />exempt from our regulation. A new 70-foot wide diversion dam on <br />Elkhead Creek gives me pause because of possible "significant <br />discernible alterations to flow or circulation" on the creek. <br />