My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C153716 Communications
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
C153716 Communications
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2014 12:22:20 PM
Creation date
4/5/2007 9:55:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153716
Contractor Name
Purgatorie River Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Grant
Water District
0
County
Las Animas
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Default Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />5. All operating records be open for inspection by any <br />Qualified representative of the Arkansas River Compact <br />Administration. <br /> <br />The District approved the addition of these conditions to the Operating Prin- <br />ciples by resolution adopted by the Board of Directors on January 26, 1967. <br />The Bu reau in a 1 etter to Governor Dock i ng of Kansas (dated March 20, 1967) <br />clearly set forth the "operating principles" and the five conditions in <br />one document so as to avoid any misunderstanding in the future as to their <br />intent and purpose. The operating principles which were included as exhibits to <br />the repayment contract and the model decree transfer were already in place prior <br />to the letter and did not address these conditions. The June 6, 1967, minutes <br />of the Compact Administration indicate their approval of the amended operating <br />principles. <br /> <br />In 1976, prior to the supplementary decree of December 3, 1976, Highland <br />Irrigation Company intervened in the transfer of the Model decree proceedings <br />in an attempt to modify the April 15, 1965 Model right to limit the storage <br />transferred under that decree to 6,000 acre-feet or less. The Colorado Supreme <br />Court (C.S.C. No. 27492) ruled that the Model right transferred 20,000 acre- <br />feet of storage. <br /> <br />Trinidad Reservoir was declared ready to impound water on January 1, 1977, by <br />the Corps. The Colorado District No. 19 water court declared that storage of <br />i rri gat i on water cou 1 d commence January 1, 1977. However, storage of water <br />under the transferred Model right did not began until August 1977 and then only <br />to store a maximum of 2,140 acre-feet before storage was stopped due to <br />downstream users in Colorado enjoining to prevent storage of winter inflows. <br />The case was brought before the Colorado Supreme Court (No. 27962), and an opi- <br />nion was issued on March 5, 1979 in favor of the District. Full project oper- <br />ation commenced immediately. <br /> <br />Since May 1979 most of the Project canals have operated using water regulated at <br />Trinidad Reservoir. However, between 1979 and 1982, the Model lands were not <br />irrigated due to distribution system rehabilition. From 1982 through 1984 the <br />amount of Model acreage steadily increased, with all l\1odel lands irrigated by <br />1985. <br /> <br />Concerns about Trinidad Reservoir operation were first discussed at a special <br />meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Administration called by Kansas officials <br />on June 30, 1980. The meeting was called to discuss the practice of trans- <br />ferring water among the storage pools of Trinidad Reservoir. Kansas. position <br />was that storage had occurred in violation of the Operating Principles for the <br />Trinidad Project. This issue was investigated by the Compact Administration and <br />further discussed at subsequent meetings without resolution. Additional con- <br />cerns over storage of water in Trinidad Reservoir during 1981 and 1982 were <br />raised by Kansas at the March 25, 1983 Compact Administration meeting. At this <br />meeting, in addition to the transfer of water between accounts, Kansas raised <br />Questions regarding storage water accounting procedures, over diversion by <br />ditche.s ...lithin the Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District and flood flow <br />release from the reservoir. A resolution regarding the Kansas allegations was <br />presented, discussed and tabled. <br /> <br />The issues raised by Kansas continued to be a topic of discussion at Compact <br />Administration meetings. At the December 11, 1984 meeting the Compact <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.