Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'.. <br /> <br />-.-., <br />/ y;" <br /> <br />:;i <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />The City of Fort Morgan File <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Bill Green <br /> <br />DA TE: <br /> <br />January 23, 1998 <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />Consent to Parity - Financial Analysis <br /> <br />At the November 24, 1997 Board meeting, the Board authorized the Director to execute a <br />consent to parity for the City of Fort Morgan's August 7, 1995 CWCB loan conditioned <br />upon a detailed staff review of the proposed arrangements for which the City was <br />requesting parity. A copy of my November 14 memo to the Board is included here as <br />Attachment A. The following memo outlines the financial aspects of the staff analysis for <br />the parity test. <br /> <br />On December 16, 1997, the Deputy Director of the CWCB signed a Consent to Issuance <br />of Parity Bonds (Attachment B to this memo) allowing parity on our existing loan to the <br />City of Fort Morgan with: (1) $31 million in water revenue bonds issued by the City in <br />December 1997, (2) the December 16, 1997 reimbursement agreement between the City <br />of Fort Morgan and State Street Bank and Trust, and (3) loans or bonds to be issued by <br />the Colorado Water Resources and Power Development Authority and by USDA Rural <br />Development for retiring a portion of the $31 million in revenue bonds issued by the City. <br /> <br />The approval was based on the conditions set forth in a Coverage Certificate by <br />Anderson, Lee & Company dated December 16, 1997 (Attachment C to this memo). The <br />conditions in the coverage certificate, in turn, are based on the water rate schedules in <br />Exhibits A, Band C to the Coverage Certificate and on the revenues and expenditures in <br />the City's 40-year projection in Attachment D to this memo. <br /> <br />Paragraph 4 of the Coverage Certificate states that in the year 2000, if the rate schedule in <br />Exhibit C is in effect, net water system revenues, exclusive of connection fees, would be <br />$2,477,537. This figure is obtained by adding the projections for Total Residential <br />Revenue and Total Commercial Revenue and subtracting Annual Operating Expenses for <br />the year 2000 in the City's projections in Attachment D to this memo. (Included with the <br />projections is a detailed summary of revenues by customer classification.) This was then <br />compared with a debt service figure of $2,368,007 to demonstrate that net revenues <br />would exceed debt service in 2000 under the given assumptions. <br /> <br />The debt service is for all existing debt less the $31 million in interim bond financing <br />which would be replaced by $31 million in new loans from the CWCB, the Water and <br />Power Authority, and USDA Rural Development. The new loans are included in the <br />projections. <br />