Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-; <br /> <br />Ms. Honey R. Moschetti, President <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br />December 19, 1994 <br /> <br />Based on our visual inspection, it appears that the condition of the dam and appurtenances is <br />good, except for the two concrete raise sections. Consistent with previous inspections by the <br />SEO and others, it appears that the dam safety issue of greatest concern is the poor condition of <br />the upper 12 feet of the dam, representing the two concrete raises constructed in the 1930' s. The <br />concrete in this portion of the dam is exhibiting considerable deterioration, generally in the form <br />of spalling and pattern cracking. This deterioration is probably the result of freeze-thaw <br />weathering and erosion due to overtopping flows. These effects can be initiated and accelerated <br />by poor concrete quality and poor placement techniques. The surface deterioration was observed <br />to extend as far as six inches or more below the original surface of the concrete, exposing the <br />steel reinforcement in some areas. The lower raise section appears to be in generally poorer <br />condition than the upper raise section, probably due in large part to lower quality concrete. <br />Deterioration of the concrete in the lower raise is reported to extend as much as 18 inches. <br />Concrete cores obtained and tested in 1986 indicate that the concrete in the lower raise section <br />has compressive strengths i_n_!~~~g~ of 95()"to- 1,400 po~s per square inch (psi). Tests of <br />the concrete iii.-ilie- upper-raise section indicated compressive strengths of between 3,300 and <br />5,600 psi. Numerous areas of efflorescence were noted on the surface of the concrete, indicating <br />that water is seeping through the concrete. This seepage could be the result of cracks extending <br />through the section, or a relatively porous concrete. <br /> <br />Other items noted during our visual inspection included: <br /> <br />1. Seepage through the foundation rock in the left abutment, and at the downstream toe <br />of the dam to the right of the outlet works. <br /> <br />2. Minor efflorescence on the masonry downstream face of the original dam. <br /> <br />DATA REVIEW <br /> <br />A vailable Data <br /> <br />Available data regarding the design, construction and past performance of the dam is limited. <br />The following documents were reviewed: <br /> <br />1. SEO dam safety inspection reports, dating from as early as 1973, and various <br />correspondence between the SEO and the DeWeese-Dye Ditch and Reservoir Co. <br /> <br />2. A National Dam Safety Program Phase I Inspection Report, prepared in 1980 by <br />International Engineering Co., Inc. <br /> <br />3. A reservoir capacity survey performed in 1992 by Great Divide Engineering and <br />Surveying. <br /> <br />94311\DDREPORT L'" <br />