Laserfiche WebLink
<br />"a._. <br /> <br />generated by the Stonnbergers on an annual basis are pledged to the Lower Logan Well Users. The <br />Lower Logan Wells Users managed all their members well depletions and provide augmentation <br />water to allow their members to continue pumping their wells. The Lower Logan Well Users <br />recently received their conditional water decree for their augmentation plan in January of 2005. <br /> <br />In the fall of2002 the Stromberger's hired the seIVices of Brent Nation, P.E., of Nation Engineering <br />SeIVices, to complete a feasibility study to construct a well augmentation/recharge project. This <br />study was completed in November of2002, identifying a new water right to be acquired up to 35 cfs <br />with an average annual yield of 6,500 acre-feet. <br /> <br />Below is a brief summary of the major project elements and their estimated cost as presented in the <br />original feasibility study: <br /> <br />1. Drill Recharge/Augmentation Wells <br />2. Wells and Installation <br />3. 5280-ft. 18-inchPVC Pipeline <br />4. 14,405-ft. 21-inch PVC Pipeline <br />5. Pipeline Installation . <br />6. Electricity for Wells <br />7. Excavation Recharge Ponds <br />8. Contingency <br />9. Planning, Surveying, and Design <br /> <br />$63,000 <br />$105,000 <br />$38,500 <br />$151,500 <br />$29,500 <br />$14,500 <br />$3,000 <br />$50,000 <br />$5,000 <br /> <br />Total: <br /> <br />$460,000 <br /> <br />The estimated total cost of the project at the time of construction was $460,000, as summarized <br />above. During construction of the project, however, various line items experienced cost overruns. <br />These various cost overruns are summarized in detail on the attached spreadsheet prepared by the <br />Stromberger Land and Cattle Company. <br /> <br />The project has been completed and is currently operational. The total cost of the completed <br />project is $525,517, which is $65,517 more then the original cost estimate, or approximately a <br />14.2% more then the originally scoped project. <br /> <br />The main reason for the cost overrun was increasing 7,000-ft. of 21-inch pipe to 24-inch pipe. The <br />pipe size was increased to 24-inch to maximize the 10,000 GPM output achieved at one of the <br />recharge wells at the river. The increased pipe size resulted in larger valves and fittings along the <br />7,000- ft. of pipe, which was at a higher cost as well. The increased capacity of the well, with the <br />increased pipe size, allows the Strombergers to maximize their acre-foot pumping output to the <br />recharge ponds, during critical times when there is no call on the river. <br /> <br />Based on the additional costs as presented above, the Stromberger Land and Cattle Company is <br />requesting a loan increase of $59,000, which meets their available collateral for the project, as <br />discussed in more detail below. The remaining additional construction cost to complete the project <br />is being covered by the Strombergers. <br /> <br />2 <br />