Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Jim Jones of South Adams County Water and Sanitation District ("SACWSD") <br />stated that SACWSD was willing to loan up to $100,000 as temporary financing for the <br />project until permanent financing could be arranged, Tom Cech of Central Colorado <br />Water Conservancy District ("Central") suggested that the Board contact the Colorado <br />Water Conservation Board ("CWCB") with regard to permanent financing. <br /> <br />Following a great deal of discussion Stockholder Robert Sakata moved that the <br />Board be authorized to borrow those amounts necessary to repair the spillway as quickly <br />as possible. Stockholder Dave Petrocco seconded said motion and it passed <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />President Brancucci then called on Ditch Superintendent George McDonald to <br />report. Mr, McDonald reported that the main ditch had been turned on March 13, 2003, <br />the Branch Ditch on March 31,2003 and that water had reached the extension April 16, <br />1003. The Ditch had been turned off for about two (2) weeks due to a break but had been <br />turned back on March 2ih. <br /> <br />A total of26,756 acre-feet had been diverted at the river headgate and 3,72 acre- <br />feet per share delivered. The Ditch had been operated in sections from July 11 to August <br />26. The third section had been cleaned after the ditch had been turned off for the year. <br /> <br />Following Mr, McDonald's report President Brancucci asked Mr. Cech of Central <br />ifhe would like to say a few words, Mr. Cech reported that trial on Central's <br />augmentation plan for its 1,000 irrigation wells was set for May on005. A new <br />subdistrict had been formed to pick up those wells once serviced by GASP. The new <br />subdistrict would need to acquire augmentation water as it would not be able to utilize <br />any of Central's current water portfolio. It was anticipated that Central would spend over <br />$2 million in attorney and engineering fees related to augmentation plans over the next <br />two (2) years. In addition, the new subdistrict was pursuing a bond invitation which <br />would give it $20 million for water and storage. <br /> <br />Mr. Petrocco asked Mr. Cech if Central would be requiring wells to be metered. <br />Mr, Cech replied that Central was currently doing a pilot study on metering, and the he <br />thought the Central Board would eventually have no choice but to require the metering of <br />all wells. Mr. Cech having nothing further, President Brancucci thanked him for his <br />presentation. <br /> <br />The next matter to come before the stockholder's was the report of the Attorney. <br />Mr. Steele reported that numerous parties had brought cases requesting augmentation <br />plans utilizing Fulton shares and that the Company and applicant's were working together <br />to see that day to day ditch operations were effected as little as possible and to insure that <br />all shareholders received their pro rata share of water diverted. In addition, Fulton was in <br />the process of pursuing its own recharge plan which had a projected benefit of up to $3.9 <br />million, with a cost to benefit ratio of 10.8 to 1. <br /> <br />Mr. Steele closed by reporting that the SACWSD lining project was set to begin <br />in the fall of2005, and the first portion to be substantially completed by March of 2006. <br /> <br />The meeting then turned to the matter of assessments for 2004, President <br />Brancucci stated that the board was recommending an increase from $22 to $30 per <br />share. Stockholder Robert Sakata moved that the assessments be increased from $22 to <br />$30 per share for 2004. Jim Jones, proxy holder for SACWSD seconded said motion and <br />it passed unanimously. <br /> <br />The final matter of business to be addressed by the stockholder was the election of <br />Directors. Mr. Robert Sakata nominated that the current Board consisting of Paul <br />Schmidt, Cecil King, Steve Brancucci, Clint Blackhurst and interim director Dave <br />Petrocco, Sr., as a slate and moved that the Secretary cast a unanimous ballot, Alfred <br />Windler seconded said motion and it passed unanimously. <br />