My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LPPD000391
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
LPPD000391
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:17:43 AM
Creation date
3/26/2007 10:35:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153715
Contractor Name
Lower Arkansas Water Management Association
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
67
County
Prowers
Bill Number
SB 96-124
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />March 1996 Final <br /> <br />whether it will be regulated in reservoir storage. Although LAWMA probably can purchase <br />water from these sources during the next few years, the long term availability of these <br />sources is questionable. Allowing for 15 percent transit losses to bring this water into Water <br />District 67, the actual cost to LAWMA would range from about $7.06 to $23.53 per acre- <br />foot. In addition, several of the ditch companies in Water District 67 have indicated they <br />would be willing to sell water to LAWMA from their share of the transit loss account residual. <br /> <br />Comoarison of Well Deoletions and Reolacement Water Reauirements <br /> <br />Table 9 shows the accounting of LAWMA's replacement credits and replacement <br />requirements for 1990-94 average well pumping. Column 2 indicates whether the accounting <br />entries are well depletion values or replacement deliveries. Column 3 shows the consumptive <br />use that was estimated for the various replacement deliveries. Columns 4 and 5 show the <br />accounting with respect to Colorado water rights -- the amounts of the well depletion values <br />or replacement deliveries in acre-feet and remarks relating to the derivation of the amounts. <br />Columns 6 and 7 show the accounting with respect to Usable Stateline Flow. Negative values <br />are used in Columns 4 and 6 with well depletion values, and positive values are used with <br />replacement deliveries. <br /> <br />Above Keesee. The well depletions affecting Colorado surface rights above the Keesee <br />headgate were estimated at 408 acre-feet. These well depletions affected primarily the Fort <br />Bent Ditch or were passed downstream under the priority system to the Amity or Lamar <br />Canals. LA WMA would take credit in this reach for 164 ace-feet of transit loss account water <br />and 1 34 acre-feet of Fryingpan-Arkansas Project return flow. These two values were <br />obtained from Tables 6 and 7 of the July 1995 report. It was assumed that only 88 acre-feet <br />of this Fryingpan-Arkansas Project water (66 percent of the total) accrued to the river during <br />April through October. LAWMA also would dedicate 152 Fort Bent Ditch Company shares <br />for use within that system. These 152 Fort Bent shares would yield an average of 156 acre- <br />feet to the remaining Fort Bent shareholders after reduction for a 23 percent canal loss. <br /> <br />The replacements made with Fryingpan-Arkansas Project return flow and Fort Bent <br />shares would also increase Usable Stateline Flow. Analyses made with the Kansas H-I Model <br /> <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.