My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LPPD000265
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
LPPD000265
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2010 3:36:11 PM
Creation date
3/26/2007 10:19:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153756
Contractor Name
Lower Arkansas Water Management Association
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
67
County
Prowers
Bill Number
SB 96-124
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />a <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />LA WMA is a non-profit organization of groundwater users in the Lower Arkansas Valley <br />in Colorado. The organization provides replacement water to offset the depletions to the <br />Arkansas River caused by groundwater pumping of its members. Replacement water is <br />provided through the administration of a replacement plan, in amounts sufficient to meet <br />the requirements of Colorado senior water rights and the obligations to Kansas under the <br />Colorado/Kansas Compact. <br /> <br />LA WMA owns direct flow and storage water rights that constitute its permanent <br />replacement water supply. To acquire these rights, LA WMA has borrowed money from <br />the Colorado Water Conservation Board payable over the term of 40 years. <br /> <br />LA WMA has sufficient permanent water to meet its members' replacement demand during <br />average and wet years. During dry years demand by its agricultural irrigation members <br />increases significantly (due partly to the fact that the junior surface water rights of its <br />supplemental irrigators may be out ofpriority) while LA WMA's replacement supply <br />decreases (due to the fact that LAWMA's jlll1ior direct flow rights may be out of priority). <br />If LA WMA maintains sufficient storage reserves in John Martin Reservoir, LA WMA may <br />be able to meet the demands of its agricultural irrigation members during a single dry year. <br />Maintaining storage reserves, however, may require some pumping cut backs in average <br />years. LA WMA's permanent water supply is insufficient to fully meet the demands of its <br />members during a second consecutive dry year. <br /> <br />Assuming that lease water is available in the "spot" market at a reasonable price, LA WMA <br />may be able to meet all of its members' demands by leasing water at an additional cost. If <br />not, LA WMA's water supplies will be insufficient to set aside reserves or to fully meet the <br />demands of its members during dry years. <br /> <br />LA WMA's existing organizational structure is not responsive to the circumstances and <br />risks created by dry years. The structure does not provide a plan for the distribution of <br />pumping reduction or curtaihnent among its members in times of shortage or for reserve <br />purposes, nor does it guarantee a continuous source of revenue during years of reduced <br />pumping. Under LA WMA's ClllTent fee system (which is based to a large extent on dollars <br />per acre-foot of depletion), if pumping is reduced revenues will decrease which in tum <br />affects LA WMA's ability to meet its obligations to the Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />and others. <br /> <br />The purpose of this study is to evaluate alternative organizational structures or <br />modifications to the ClllTent structure that would be responsive to the conditions created by <br />dry years. lhis report presents a total offive alternative methods of water and costs <br />allocation. Two of these altematives (Cl and C2) keep the present membership structure. <br />The other three (S I, S2 and S3) would change the nature of the organization from a <br />membership-based structure to a "share" system. After a series of discussions with <br /> <br />EnWater Resource Consultants September 5,1997 Final Report <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.