My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LPPD000265
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
LPPD000265
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2010 3:36:11 PM
Creation date
3/26/2007 10:19:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153756
Contractor Name
Lower Arkansas Water Management Association
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
67
County
Prowers
Bill Number
SB 96-124
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Curtailment is defined as the percent reduction a group's water allocation compared to <br />what that group is allocated in a normal year. Normal year allocation is equivalent to <br />past normal year pumping and is based on historical water demand use patterns. <br />Curtailment is expressed as a percentage reduction and is calculated as: <br /> <br />(past normal year pumping) - (allowed pumping this year) <br />(past normal year pumping) <br /> <br />x <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />If in a dry year supplemental users are only allowed to pmnp 58,500 af, these users have <br />a demand shortfall of 17%. Relative to a normal year allocation of 49,966 af, however, <br />they were not curtailed. In this situation, the curtaihnent measure is equal to -17%~ that <br />IS, <br /> <br />[(49,966- 58,500)/49,966] x 100 = -17%. <br /> <br />Here, the negative sign means that supplemental users are allowed to pmnp 17% more <br />water as compared to nonnal year allocations. In this example, even though <br />supplemental users are allocated additional water (as compared to a normal year) they <br />still have a demand shortfall because their water needs have increased by more. <br /> <br />As way of another example, if in a different dry year supplemental users are only allowed <br />to pmnp 42,000 af, curtailment would equalI5.94%~ that is, <br /> <br />[(49,966- 42,000)/49,966] x 100 = 15.94%. <br /> <br />Curtailment in this situation denotes that, as compared to normal conditions, they are <br />allocated 15.94% less water. Demand shortfall in this situation, however, is 43.96% <br /> <br />As is the case with demand shortfall, curtailment can either be calculated using pumping <br />demand or replacement demand. <br /> <br />Bill Impact <br /> <br />Each allocation method is described in terms of its impacts on individual user groups' <br />LA WMA water bills. Bill impacts are reported as: total bills, dollars per share (if <br />evaluating the shares organization), dollars per well and dollars per af of water pumped. <br /> <br />LAWMA Revenue Stability <br /> <br />From LA WMA's perspective a desirable allocation method is one which generates a <br />stable stream of revenues. Allocation methods which generate large fluctuations in <br />arumal LA WMA revenues make it difficult for LA WMA to pay its bills (in years when <br />revenues are extremely low) and are difficult for LA WMA to justify to its members (in <br />years when revenues are extremely high). <br /> <br />EnWater Resource Consultants September 5, 1997 Final Report <br /> <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.