My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board Metting 01/23/2007
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
Board Metting 01/23/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:45:02 PM
Creation date
3/7/2007 11:07:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/23/2007
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Pat Edelmann, of the U.S. Geological Survey, reported flows on the Arkansas River into John Martin <br />were 132,400 acre-feet, about 68 percent of average, and 53,340 at Coolidge, Kan., or 34 percent of <br />average. Low flows on the Purgatoire River and tributaries below John Martin are only at 29-51 percent . <br />of average. <br /> <br />Fountain Creek Settlement Talks at Impasse: Efforts to agree on a plan to stop Colorado Springs' <br />polluting of Fountain Creek seem at an impasse, attorneys said in U.S. District Court on Dec. 15. <br /> <br />The attorneys, representing the Pueblo County district attorney and the Sierra Club, told a magistrate <br />judge that their lawsuits against the city probably can't be settled without a court order. A court order <br />would specify what Colorado Springs must do to stop spills of sewage, excessive chlorine and nonpotable <br />water into the creek, and what penalties the city must pay. <br /> <br />The attorneys said they are far apart with Colorado Springs in trying to reach agreement of what would be <br />in a court order. The attorneys, however, also said they are willing to consider using a private mediator to <br />try to agree with Colorado Springs on terms of a proposed court order. A proposed court order could be <br />presented to a judge for approval. <br /> <br />Attorney John Barth, representing District Attorney Bill Thiebaut, and attorney Eric Huber, representing <br />Sierra, gave their bleak assessment to Magistrate Judge Boyd Boland. He called the court proceeding to <br />see ifhis efforts to help the litigants try to reach a settlement would be productive. <br />If Thiebaut and the environmental group can't agree with Colorado Springs on what remedies and <br />penalties would be in a court order, a trial may be necessary. <br /> <br />Colorado Springs is putting priority on its efforts to have the presiding judge, Walker Miller, throw out <br />the lawsuits, rather than putting priority on reaching agreement to settle them. Without agreement on <br />terms of a court order, a trial would be necessary for Miller to determine what a court order would . <br />require, unless the judge throws out the lawsuits before a trial. <br /> <br />Attorneys for the three litigants demonstrated at Friday's status conference little indication of <br />compromising. Boland ordered officials of Colorado Springs, the environmental group and the district <br />attorneys office to attend a confidential settlement conference with Boland on March 5. All of the <br />officials must have authority to reach a settlement. The closed-door settlement negotiations are to start <br />soon after a pretrial conference between the litigants and Boland that already was set for the same day. <br /> <br />It is possible that presiding judge Miller could rule before then on whether to throw out the lawsuits, or to <br />rule, as Thiebaut and Sierra want, that the city has violated the Clean Water Act because of the spills. <br /> <br />A settlement conference in September produced no significant progress on substantive issues. <br /> <br />Conduit Legislation Gets New Life: A bill to authorize funding for the $330 million Arkansas Valley <br />Conduit was reintroduced Jan 4 on the first day of the 1 10th Congress by U.S. Sen. Wayne Allard, R- <br />Colo. <br /> <br />Allard, along with U.S. Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo., carried the bill in the last session. The new legislation <br />is unchanged from the previous version, Allard said. Allard's bill would set the federal cost-share at 80 <br />percent, leaving the balance to be paid by the 42 communities east of Pueblo expected to participate in the <br />conduit. The bill would authorize, but not appropriate, federal funds. <br /> <br />U.S. Rep. Marilyn Musgrave, R-Colo., introduced a companion bill in the House on Thursday. <br /> <br />Hecla Junction Flood Mitigation: Heavy rains during August 11-12, 2006 in Chaffee County caused . <br />several ephemeral tributaries in the Arkansas River valley to experience unusual flash flooding. Hecla <br />Junction is within the Brown's Canyon reach of the Arkansas River Headwaters Recreation Area, and is <br /> <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.