My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJC01737 (3)
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
3001-3102
>
PROJC01737 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2015 2:46:25 PM
Creation date
3/1/2007 9:08:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153768
Contractor Name
Lower Arkansas Water Management Association
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
67
County
Bent
Prowers
Bill Number
SB 96-124
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Approval Letter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />215 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Lending <br />Rate <br />2.00% <br />3.00% <br />3.75% <br /> <br />Table 3. Lendine: Rate Comparison <br />Payments <br />Years 1-10 <br />$67.200 <br />$67.200 <br />$67,200 <br /> <br />Payments <br />years 11-40 <br />$ 87.650 <br />$112 500 <br />$134,700 <br /> <br />It should also be noted that: (1) LAWMA's previous water rights loan was made at a 3,0 percent <br />rate of return, (2) the requested lending rate is 1.75 percent less than the Board's standard <br />agricultural rate for 1997, (3) the term of the requested loan is ten years longer than our standard <br />loan term, (4) the Board would be financing 100 percent of the acquisition costs, and (5) the <br />annual payments in the first ten years would be reduced at LA WMA' s request which procedure is <br />not typical of most of our loans. <br /> <br />We are sensitive to the sequence of expensive and frustrating requirements facing water users in <br />the Arkansas Basin as a result of decisions in Kansas v. Colorado. The Board has made extensive <br />efforts to be of assistance to Arkansas Basin water users under these circumstances and will <br />continue to be of assistance to other water user associations as they prepare augmentation <br />programs and apply for funding of these programs. <br /> <br />We are also concerned, however, that adequate resources be available in the Construction Fund to <br />provide similar assistance to other Colorado water users in the future. Our experience in the last <br />few years has been that the list of funding needs continues to grow and the cost of potential <br />projects continues to increase. The stafffeels very strongly that 3.0 percent is the minimum rate of <br />return needed to offset, to at least some extent, the long-term impacts of inflation on the principal <br />of this loan over a period of 40 years. <br /> <br />ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL FEASffiILITY <br /> <br />Helton & Williamsens' letter report includes a projection of revenues and expenditures for <br />LAWMA from the present through the end of the period ofCWCB debt retirement in 2038. <br />Attachment B is our adaptation of the spreadsheet in the report with projections which include a <br />new 2.0 percent loan and a new 3.0 percent loan. In both scenarios, deficits begin occurring in <br />2004 but small to moderate rate increases would likely eliminate these. <br /> <br />Assuming total well pumping by LA WMA members of 85,000 acre-feet per year, these costs <br />would result in a cost per acre-foot pumped in the year 2009 of about $5.25 under the 2.0 percent <br />loan scenario and $5.54 per acre-foot under the 3.0 percent loan scenario. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.