My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ISFAPPC01448 (2)
CWCB
>
Instream Flow Appropriations
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
ISFAPPC01448 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2017 11:38:04 AM
Creation date
2/27/2007 11:08:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Instream Flow Appropriations
Case Number
04CW0084
Stream Name
Green Creek
Water Division
2
Water District
11
County
Chaffee
Instream Flow App - Doc Type
Supplemental Data
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Table 1: Data <br /> <br />Party Date Q 250%-40% Summer (3/3) Winter (2/3) <br />CDOW 9/1712003 3.41 8.6 - 1.4 3.0 1.5 <br />CDOW 9/1712003 3.03 7.7 - 1.2 6.3 1.5 <br />BLM 4/0312003 3.31 8.2 - 1.3 2.7 1.8 <br />BLM 4/0312003 2.86 7.1 - 1.1 2.2 1.9 <br />CDOW 7/1212000 6.22 15.5 - 2.5 3.6 2.6 <br />CDOW 9/1712003 3.82 9.6 - 1.5 4.2 l.4ll) <br />CD OW 9/1712003 3.16 7.9 - 1.3 5.3 l.2ll) <br /> <br />BLM = Bureau of Land Management DOW = Division of Wildlife <br />(I) Predicted flow outside of the accuracy range of Manning's Equation. ? = Criteria never met in R2CROSS Staging Table. <br /> <br />Biologic Flow Recommendation <br />The summer flow recommendations, which meet 3 of 3 criteria and are within the accuracy range <br />of the R2CROSS model, range from 6.3 cfs to 2.2 cfs (See Table 1 ). Averaging the seven <br />summer flow recommendations within range results in a 3.9 cfs summer recommendation. The <br />winter flow recommendations, which meet 2 of 3 criteria and are within the accuracy range of <br />the R2CROSS model range from 2.6 cfs to 1.5 cfs (See Table 1). Averaging the five winter flow <br />recommendations within range results in a 1.9 cfs winter recommendation. <br /> <br />Hydrologic Data <br /> <br />After receiving the cooperating agency's biologic recommendation, the CWCB staff conducted <br />an evaluation of the stream hydrology to determine if water was physically available for an <br />instream flow appropriation. The hydro graph below was derived from data collected by the <br />USGS stream gage for Poncha Creek at Poncha, CO (ill #07093000), which has a drainage area <br />of 56 square miles (See Gage Summary in Appendix C). The total drainage area of the Green <br />Creek Drainage is approximately 18 square miles. The period of record for this gage was 1911- <br />1918, the period of record used by staff in their analysis was 1911-1918, or 7 years of record. <br />Table 2 below displays the estimated stream flow of Green Creek, in terms of a percentage of <br />exceedence. <br /> <br />Table 2: Estimated Green Creek Stream Flow <br /> <br />Exceedences <br />1% <br />5% <br />10% <br />20% <br />50% <br />80% <br />90% <br />95% <br />99% <br /> <br />Januarv Februarv March ADrll Mav June Julv August Sentember October November December <br />4.19 4.62 6.43 23.27 60.36 64.29 41.14 17.69 11.09 12.21 6.56 4.50 <br />3.21 3.21 5.14 17.36 62.07 55.29 34.71 13.55 7.07 10.61 7.07 3.66 <br />2.69 2.69 4.24 11.69 49.16 47.25 26.42 11.69 6.43 7.26 5.14 3.63 <br />2.57 2.70 3.54 6.36 42.11 41.79 14.65 6.04 4.16 4.16 3.54 3.21 <br />2.25 2.25 2.57 6.11 23.79 26.66 6.36 5.14 2.69 2.57 2.25 2.25 <br />0.96 1.29 0.96 3.66 12.66 16.00 6.43 3.54 1.93 1.93 1.29 1.13 <br />0.64 0.64 0.96 2.69 7.71 13.62 5.14 2.69 1.93 1.61 1.29 0.96 <br />0.64 0.64 0.64 2.57 6.43 11.25 4.62 2.25 1.54 1.29 1.29 0.60 <br />0.64 0.64 0.32 1.16 5.79 6.71 4.16 1.77 1.13 1.01 0.60 0.46 <br /> <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.