My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00268
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
Backfile
>
WMOD00268
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:29:09 PM
Creation date
2/27/2007 9:01:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Applicant
CWCB
Sponsor Name
USBR
Project Name
Final Report Weather Damage Mitigation Program
Title
Numerical Simulations of Snowpack Augmentation for Drought Mitigation Studies in the Colorado Rocky Mountains
Prepared For
USBR - WDMP
Prepared By
Curt Hartzell, Dr. William Cotton, Joe Busto
Date
9/1/2005
State
CO
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Scientific Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />36 <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />This task was comprised of two parts, viz. selling up the MRBP code for the <br />evaluation, and then using the adapted code for the MRBP analysis. Results of <br />the MRBP evaluation of model performance are summarized in Subsection 3.7. <br /> <br />Dr. Paul Mielke provided a copy of the MRBP Analysis Code. His original <br />code was translated from FORTRAN?? 10 FORTRAN90 (a more widely used <br />version) and modified for the project by Dr. Gustava Carri6. However, the modified <br />program strictly follows Mielke's methodology. The updated version of MRBP <br />consisted of two codes (note - this brief summary does not intend to describe the <br />methodology associated with the MRBP analysis that is explained in detail in <br />Mielke et aI., 2001): <br /> <br /> <br />INPUT.f90: This code reads observational and simulated precipitation fields for a <br />series of stations. These input files (obse.dat, reglr.dat, and seed.dat) are written <br />in a free format matrix with rows and columns corresponding to days and <br />stations, respectively. The number of stations (N_STAT) and the number of days <br />to be considered in the test (N_DAYS) are input parameters. The code generates <br />input matrices in the format needed by the MRBP analysis for RAMS standard <br />simulations and for seeded runs (rglr_mrbp.ln and seed_mrbp.in, respectively). <br />These files consist of a series of blocks corresponding to different lest conditions. <br />An example of the format of each block of the file that1NPUT.f90 would generate <br />for three stations and four days is given as a comment at the beginning of <br />MRBP.f90. Each block is preceded by a line that tests conditions. <br /> <br />MRBP.f90: This code computes the test statistic and associated P-value of a <br />randomized block experiment. The program performs repeated MRBP analysis in <br />one operation considering different input parameters such as alignment within <br />blocks, distance function commensuration and rank tests (see Mielke, 2001). <br />While running the program, it gives the user the option to compare the <br />observation vs. the regular simulations or observation VS. the seeded runs and <br />automatically selects the corresponding input matrix. The outputs for the <br />comparison of the observation vs. the non-seeded and seeded runs are written in <br />two text files: seed_mrbp.out and rglr_mrbp.oul. respectively, The agreement <br />measure, P-value, as well as the value of delta, its expected value, the variance <br />and skewness are given for all above-mentioned options. This code performs <br />repeated MRBP analysis in one operation considering different test conditions <br />and therefore the corresponding results are also written in each output file. <br /> <br />2,10 Task 6 . Research study supervision and reports <br /> <br />The grant agreement rrom Reclamation for the Colorado WDMP required <br />three quarterly technical progress reports, a mid-project meeting between <br />Reclamation research staff and the Colorado WDMP Project Team, a presentation <br />on the overall project after project research studies and evaluations had been <br />essentially completed, and a final report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.