My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00268
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
Backfile
>
WMOD00268
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:29:09 PM
Creation date
2/27/2007 9:01:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Applicant
CWCB
Sponsor Name
USBR
Project Name
Final Report Weather Damage Mitigation Program
Title
Numerical Simulations of Snowpack Augmentation for Drought Mitigation Studies in the Colorado Rocky Mountains
Prepared For
USBR - WDMP
Prepared By
Curt Hartzell, Dr. William Cotton, Joe Busto
Date
9/1/2005
State
CO
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Scientific Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />30 <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />The products generated by CSU for the project's Web site are created <br />using NCAR Graphics code lhat is distributed as part of the overall RAMS <br />package. This package analyzes data directly on the RAMS grid, without any <br />interpolation necessary (unless the analysis is on a constant pressure surface, in <br />which case there is vertical interpolation). On the precipitation maps the inward <br />poinling lick marks indicate the center of each 3 x 3-km grid cell. This method <br />uses the actual grid-poinl data, which allows an analyst to zoom in and look at <br />exactly what the model values are at a specific point. making troubleshooting <br />easier. The RAMS Real-time forecast graphics are generated using the GrADS <br />graphics package, which is in widespread use by lots of modelers (RAMS and <br />otherwise) because of its open sourcing and ease of using. With this package, <br />the RAMS data are horizontally interpolated to a latitude-longitude grid with about <br />the same resolution as the 3-km data. The area plotted on a GrADS Grid 3 map <br />is a little smaller than the actual RAMS Grid 3 domain (because of differences <br />between the RAMS Polar-Stereographic mapping and the GrADS latitude- <br />longitude mapping). But for all practical purposes, lhe resultanl fields are the <br />same regardless of which package is used. <br /> <br />The difference between the 24-hr simulated precipitation accumulations <br />from the NCAR Graphics and GrADS graphics packages is visually noticeable. <br />Figure 2.11 was generated using Grads. The precipitation accumulation is for <br />the 8-hr to 32-hr forecast period ending November 11, 2003 at 0800 UTC (0100 <br />MST). Figure 2.14 is the simulated precipitation accumulation for the same 24-hr <br />period generaled after-the-fact by using NCAR graphics. <br /> <br />At the time the WDMP Colorado Financial Assistance Agreement was <br />awarded (October 2003), it was expected that the existing CSU RAMS PC <br />Cluster would be available for daily model non-seeded forecast runs until the new <br />PC processors were procured and the cluster expanded. However, due 10 delay <br />in finalizing the CWCB-CSU Interagency Agreement for the research project (not <br />signed until December 9, 2003), CSU was not able to purchase the new PC <br />processors on the schedule they had anticipated. Consequently, starting the <br />evening of December 1, 2003, CSU switched the real-time 0000 UTC RAMS <br />forecast cycle from their faster cluster to a slower one. This change was due to <br />impending deadlines of two other research projects where the use of the faster <br />cluster was critical; i.e., they required the greater memory and processing speed <br />of the faster cluster. The model-forecast products still got to the CSU Web site, <br />bul at a 3-limes slower rate than usual. (The slower forecast run took 12 to 14 <br />hours of compuler time to finish.) The model-forecast output was still archived <br />on the CSU project Web site as usual. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.