Laserfiche WebLink
<br />30 <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />The products generated by CSU for the project's Web site are created <br />using NCAR Graphics code lhat is distributed as part of the overall RAMS <br />package. This package analyzes data directly on the RAMS grid, without any <br />interpolation necessary (unless the analysis is on a constant pressure surface, in <br />which case there is vertical interpolation). On the precipitation maps the inward <br />poinling lick marks indicate the center of each 3 x 3-km grid cell. This method <br />uses the actual grid-poinl data, which allows an analyst to zoom in and look at <br />exactly what the model values are at a specific point. making troubleshooting <br />easier. The RAMS Real-time forecast graphics are generated using the GrADS <br />graphics package, which is in widespread use by lots of modelers (RAMS and <br />otherwise) because of its open sourcing and ease of using. With this package, <br />the RAMS data are horizontally interpolated to a latitude-longitude grid with about <br />the same resolution as the 3-km data. The area plotted on a GrADS Grid 3 map <br />is a little smaller than the actual RAMS Grid 3 domain (because of differences <br />between the RAMS Polar-Stereographic mapping and the GrADS latitude- <br />longitude mapping). But for all practical purposes, lhe resultanl fields are the <br />same regardless of which package is used. <br /> <br />The difference between the 24-hr simulated precipitation accumulations <br />from the NCAR Graphics and GrADS graphics packages is visually noticeable. <br />Figure 2.11 was generated using Grads. The precipitation accumulation is for <br />the 8-hr to 32-hr forecast period ending November 11, 2003 at 0800 UTC (0100 <br />MST). Figure 2.14 is the simulated precipitation accumulation for the same 24-hr <br />period generaled after-the-fact by using NCAR graphics. <br /> <br />At the time the WDMP Colorado Financial Assistance Agreement was <br />awarded (October 2003), it was expected that the existing CSU RAMS PC <br />Cluster would be available for daily model non-seeded forecast runs until the new <br />PC processors were procured and the cluster expanded. However, due 10 delay <br />in finalizing the CWCB-CSU Interagency Agreement for the research project (not <br />signed until December 9, 2003), CSU was not able to purchase the new PC <br />processors on the schedule they had anticipated. Consequently, starting the <br />evening of December 1, 2003, CSU switched the real-time 0000 UTC RAMS <br />forecast cycle from their faster cluster to a slower one. This change was due to <br />impending deadlines of two other research projects where the use of the faster <br />cluster was critical; i.e., they required the greater memory and processing speed <br />of the faster cluster. The model-forecast products still got to the CSU Web site, <br />bul at a 3-limes slower rate than usual. (The slower forecast run took 12 to 14 <br />hours of compuler time to finish.) The model-forecast output was still archived <br />on the CSU project Web site as usual. <br />