Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Figure 5-D <br /> <br />Figure 5-E <br /> <br />Figure 6-A <br />Figure 6-B <br />Figure 6-C. <br />Figure 6-D <br />Figure 6-E <br />Figure 7-A <br />Figure 7-B <br />Figure 7 -C. <br />Figure 7-D <br />Figure 7-E <br />Figure 8-A <br /> <br />Figure 8-B <br /> <br />Figure 8-C. <br />Figure 8-D <br /> <br />Figure 8-E <br /> <br />Figure 9-A <br />Figure 9-B <br /> <br />Figure 9-C. <br />Figure 9-D <br />Figure 9- E <br />Figure 10-A <br /> <br />Figure lO-B <br /> <br />Figure 10-C. <br /> <br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 5: Mixed Use: Central and <br />Greenway/Littleton (pool Size: 20,600 AF) <br /> <br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario 5: Mixed Use: Central and <br />Greenway/Littleton (pool Size: 20,600 AF) <br /> <br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 1: Denver (Pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 1: Denver (pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario 1: Denver (pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 1: Denver (pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario 1: Denver (Pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 2: Central (pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 2: Central (pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario 2: Central (pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 2: Central (pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario 2: Central (pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton <br />(pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton <br />(pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton (pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton <br />(Pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton <br />(pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 4: South Metro (pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 4: South Metro <br />(pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario 4: South Metro (pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 4: South Metro (pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario 4: South Metro (Pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 5: Mixed Use: Central and <br />Greenway/Littleton (pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 5: Mixed Use: Central and <br />Greenway/Littleton (pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario 5: Mixed Use: Central and Greenway/Littleton <br />(pool Size: 7,700 AF) <br /> <br />IV <br /> <br />P:\Data\GEN\CWCB\Chatfield\Report12.02\RevisedChatReport 103\ TABLE OF CONTENTS2-03.doc <br />