Laserfiche WebLink
<br />augmentation as a use is questionable. This could result in agricultural acres being dried up. Coupled <br />with the fact that the Paonia Reservoir is :filling with sediment at the rate of 100 Ac ftIyr, an ISF would <br />severely impede future development in the drainage. . <br /> <br />In conclusion, the Ragged Mountain Water Users Association would recommend that the <br />CWCB focus on building upstream reservoir augmentation sources. These creeks have huge potential <br />Storage could reduce future demand shortages, (Model shows excess flow available for storage during <br />runoff months in many years.) provide more consistent and reliable ISF, and provide water to meet <br />Compact obligations. The DOW might implement channel and fish habitat improvements or practices <br />that influence stream flows, such as vegetation management. <br /> <br />The Ragged Mountain Water User Association would like the CWCB to withdraw these <br />segments from their filing. <br /> <br />Thank you fOf consideration of these matters. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />d cv;y (Y o-fA <br /> <br />Gary V olk, President <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />Joe Sperry, Secretary- Treasurer <br /> <br /> <br />Iifi/t:~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />