My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00055 (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00055 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:43:50 PM
Creation date
2/20/2007 11:04:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/13/2006
Description
IBCC Director's Report - Interbasin Compact Committee Annual Report to the House of Representatives Com. On Agriculture, Livestock, Natural Resources, and Senate Com. On Agriculture, Energy, Natural
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Section 2 <br />Reports From Basin Roundtables <br /> <br />.. -~ . ~... <br /> <br />. Growth In the headwaters region will present <br />chattenges in obtaining augmentation water for new <br />demands. <br /> <br />. Concerns over agr\culturallransfers and its impact on <br />rural economies are signfcant in the lower portion of <br />the basin downstream of Pueblo Reservoir. <br /> <br />. Concern over water quality and suitable drinking <br />water are key concerns in the lower basin, <br /> <br />. The success of two major projects is key 10 meeting <br />future water needs, <br /> <br />. The urban landscape is very importanllo the <br />economy and an Important component to quality of <br />life. <br /> <br />As part of SWSI Phase I and II, a gap analysis was <br />conducted for the Arkansas Basin. The greatest gap in <br />the Arkansas Basin is in northern EI Paso County, where <br />8,000 acre feet (aij of gap was identified as shown in <br />Figure 2.1, below. The SWSI report, in Executive <br />Summary Finding # 5. acknowledged that possible gaps <br />related to dependence on non-renewable groundwater <br />sources were oot addressed In the SWSll report, <br />Rather, renewable sources of water are needed to <br />replace the currenl100 percent reliance on non-tributary <br /> <br />2,2 <br /> <br />and designated basin groundwater, which substantially <br />increases the potential gap, perhaps as high as 20,000 <br />ally' by 2030, <br />The Arkansas River Basin offers abundant opportunities <br />for water-based recreation: on the river and ils tributaries <br />as well as on numerous reservoirs, Fishing, boating, <br />kayaking, rafting, waler skiing, jet skiing, swimming, <br />sailing, sail boarding, and gold panning are all available. <br />as well as hiking, picnicking, camping, hunting, and <br />biking, <br /> <br />There are no ewes decreed inslream flow rights on the <br />mainslem of the Arkansas River. Via the Fry-Ark <br />Projecfs operating plan, a minimum flow of 66.0 cubic <br />feel per second (cfs) was established for the AOOinsas <br />River at Granite. which is the only legal minimum flow <br />requirement on the mainstem of the Arkansas. Water <br />exchanges are used as a management 1001 for municlpal <br />water supplies in the Arkansas Basin. A water exchange <br />is made by diverting water at one location in the river <br />system and replacing it with a like quantity of water at <br />another location, During an exchange. stream flow in the <br />reach between the two exchange locations is decreased <br />by the amount of the exchange. <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />....~_._- - <br />,~~ <br />';~I <br />--~_., -,. <br /> <br />Figure 2-1 Summary of Gap Analysls'Of" Arkan.." Basin. <br /> <br />....~. ""'-""".' .... - ,1__ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.