BOARD00054 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Assenlons Claimed Assenion Evidence is Uncenain Assenion Evidence IS InsuffICient Assenlon is Potentially Valid, Applicant Prefers Easement Region 2 Ditch Bill Application Processing Status October 1, 2006 Definitions In addition to a Drtch Bill Easement Application, a ditch owner can also claim a right to use water transmission facitities dating back to before a National Forest e"sled II is not clear whether an assenion claim is likely valid The claiment has been asked to provide additional evidence. The assenion evidence is insuffICient to recognize the assenlon claim. The assenion evaluation process is closed and the Ditch Bill evaluation process continues The assenion is likely valid, but the applICant prefers a Ditch Bill Easement The assenion analysis process is closed and the Ditch Bill evaluation process continues Assenoon is Potentially Valid, Applicant The assenion is likely valid and is preferred over a Ditch Bill Easement The assertion is recognized in US Forest Service land status records and the Ditch Bill evaluation process is Prefers Assenion suspended. .lS" Assenlon Relinquished Upon Easement Applicant assened a prior right to the water facility predating establishment of the National Forest or Grassland and upon signing the Ditch Bill easement all prevIOus assened rights were Signing relinqUished. Easement Application Suspended, Assenion Recognized Easemenl Application Withdrawn Easement Application is Denied or Wrthdrawn Easement ApplICation is Uncenain Easement Applicalion is Valid Easement ApplicatIOn is Valid NEPA Scoping Inrtiated Easement Consolidated Easement Prepared Easement Issued Ditch Bill Applications Processed . The assenion is likely valid and is preferred over a Ditch Bill Easement The assertion IS recognized in US Forest Service land status records and the Ditch Bill evaluation process is suspended ApplICant has voluntairty withdrawn the application in writing. The Ditch Application is closed. Applicant does not meet one of 9 established criteria or the applicanl has voluntairty withdrawn the application in writing. The Ditch ApplICation is closed. II is not clear whether a Ditch Bill Easement application meets all 9 criteria. The Ditch Bill Easement Applicant has been asked to provide additional evidence A Ditch Bill Easement application meets all 9 criteria and will be issued. After easement validity has been determined, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) scoping has begun to determine under whal conditions the application will be issued to meet Federal. Stale, and Local law and policy. Two ditchbill easement applications were submitted for the same water facility on two different Forests One apphcation for each Forest The Forest with the headgate or dam will process the entire application The easement NEPA document and easement have been completed and sent to the applicant for signature. The NEPA process has been completed, all necessary signatures have been obtained, and a deed for the easement has been issued. An assertion has been recognized and the Drtch Bill Application has been suspended. A Ditch Bill ApplicatIOn has been withdrawn. A Ditch Bill Apphcation has been denied. A Ditch Bill Easement has been issued. A Ditch Bill Easement has been consolidated. 'T D~,.,.,,'" ",f,) . ...~"'" -.....- . . ...