My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00054 (2)
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00054 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:43:45 PM
Creation date
2/20/2007 11:04:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/13/2006
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />SE Allocation Committee OKs More Water for Conduit, Assesses Water Providers: On Oct. 19 the <br />allocation committee of the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District voted Thursday to <br />recommend an additional appropriation of water to the Arkansas Valley Conduit. Until the conduit is <br />built, however, the water will be used to repay a debt to Colorado Springs. Additionally, Pueblo West, <br />Manitou Springs, the Fountain Valley Conduit and cities west of Pueblo will have a little more <br />Fryingpan-Arkansas Project water available in future years. <br /> <br />The water comes from allocations formerly set aside for 15,000 acres of farmland in Crowley County <br />dried up by Aurora purchases on the Colorado Canal. <br /> <br />The allocations formerly given to the land amount to 3.59 percent of the annual total for the Southeastern <br />Colorado Water Conservancy District. The total amounts to an average of 1,881 acre-feet, based on total <br />average imports of 52,400 acre-feet. <br /> <br />The allocations committee fielded requests from 26 groups last month, but settled on a formula developed <br />by district staff at the request of President Bill Long. Executive Director Jim Broderick said the numbers <br />were calculated to provide about 1,200 acre-feet annually to the conduit - the additional amount needed to <br />meet minimum supply levels - while the rest were calculated on population levels in the 1970s, when the <br />original allocation principles were drafted. <br /> <br />The committee voted to recommend the following allocations: <br />Arkansas Valley Conduit: 2.18 percent. <br />Fountain Valley Pipeline (Colorado Springs, Fountain, Security, Wide field, Stratmoor Hills): <br />0.45 percent. <br />Cities west of Pueblo: 0.27 percent. <br />Pueblo West: 0.34 percent. <br />Manitou Springs: 0.35 percent. <br /> <br />The entire Southeastern board will consider the resolution at its November meeting. <br /> <br />In addition, the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District is assessing water providers in the <br />Arkansas Valley Conduit project for continuing expenses. <br /> <br />Lower Ark Director Leroy Mauch told the conduit committee on Sept. 19 that he would ask the Lower <br />Ark board to pay assessments, since the conduit enterprise fund had dropped below its threshold of <br />$30,000. <br /> <br />However, the Southeastern District wants to assess water providers 75 cents per capita and apply the <br />Lower Ark contribution toward a State Tribal Assistance Grant (STAG) match, said Southeastern <br />Chairman Bill Long. <br /> <br />The STAG federal share could be $600,000 to $675,000, but a local match of up to 45 percent - possibly <br />$300,000 - could be required. <br /> <br />U.S. Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Colo., requested $600,000 and U.S. Rep. Marilyn Musgrave, R-Colo., <br />requested $675,000 in STAG funds to move the conduit into the next stage, a preliminary design study. <br />The conduit also was the subject of a Senate hearing last month. Legislation sponsored by Allard, Sen. <br />Ken Salazar, D-Colo., and Musgrave would provide 80 percent federal funding to proceed with the <br />project through the Bureau of Reclamation. <br /> <br />Meanwhile, Musgrave and Rep. John Salazar have included authorization of $69 million in the Water <br />Resources Development Act. <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.