Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />2. Additional federal and nonfederal networks also are vital to the success <br />of NIDIS. These include those operated by NASA, EPA, USGS, <br />USDA/NRCS, USDA/Forest Service, DO]'s Bureau of Land <br />Management, Bureau of Reclamation, state and regional mesonets, . <br />stale Oood warning systems, etc. The necessary resources (Q maintain <br />and strengthen their monitoring capabilities and integrate them with <br />NIDIS are critical. <br /> <br />3. Using the Oklahoma Mesonet as a model, the NIDIS Leadership Team <br />should explore partnership opportunities with the National Law <br />Enforcement Telecommunications System INLETS) and the various <br />state law enforcement telecommunication systems in each state to <br />transmit real time weather and climate monitoring data <br /> <br />Recommendation 2b: The NIDIS Leadership Team should idenllfy and <br />evaluate current and historical data sources on climate, water supply and <br />storage capabilities, and drought indices for their utility and applicability. <br />NIDIS will be built on the integration of these existing databases, and expanded <br />to fill information gaps. Tools and programs to fill the current gaps in drought <br />monitoring may indude the following: <br /> <br />I. Integrating meteorological, climatological, hydrological and agricultural/ <br />vegetation drought assessment tools within the NIDIS infrastructure, <br />thereby deriving useful information beyond that contained in the <br />separately maintained databases. <br /> <br />2. Developing new drought assessment tools that provide access to <br />environmental data and analyses at the appropriate scale (e.g., state, <br />watershed. county) in a GIS modeling framework. <br /> <br />3. Creating new water resources assessment tools to improve the under- <br />standing of hydrological drought. <br /> <br />4. Producing tools capable of generating credible short- and long-term <br />drought forecasts in forms specific 10 user needs and locations. <br /> <br />5. Assembling tools to assimilate both remotely sensed (e.g., satellite, <br />radar) and in situ instrument-based observations, with emphasis on <br />techniques to analyze and model the status of drought by integrating <br />both types of observations. <br /> <br />6. Having the National Drought Mitigation Center, at the University of <br />Nebraska in Lincoln, be a principal clearinghouse for lools designed 10 <br />address the needs of the drought community. <br /> <br />Recommendation 2c: NIDIS must provide a methodolo&y to accurately and <br />comprehensively quantify the reporting of drought impacts across all relevant <br />seclors and scales, through the following actions: <br /> <br />1. Developing a Web-based reporting system to collect quantitative and <br />qualitative drought impact information for all sectors into J national <br />database within an interactive GIS modeling framework. <br /> <br />2. Dcveloping tools capable of integrating drought impacts and cllviron- <br />mental data into fonns useful for mitigation and adaptive management. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />