My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00038 (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00038 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:43:05 PM
Creation date
2/16/2007 12:14:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/20/2006
Description
WSP Section - San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program Document Revisions
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />that actions undertaken by a federal agency are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of . <br />listed species. <br /> <br />Critical Habitat Designation <br /> <br />Critical habitat is defined as the areas that provide physical or biological features that are <br />essential for the recovery of a specie~. Critical habitat was designated for the Colorado <br />pikeminnow and razorback sucker in 1994. Both species critical habitat designation is within the <br />100-year floodplain of the species' historical range. Colorado pikeminnow critical habitat was <br />designated in the following section of the San Juan River Basin (59 FR 13374): <br />New Mexico, San Juan County; and Utah, San Juan County. The San Juan River from the <br />State Route 371 Bridge in T. 29 N., R. 13 W., section 17, to the full pool elevation at the <br />mouth of Neskahai Canyon on the San Juan arm of Lake Powell in T. 41 S., R. 11 E., section <br />26. <br /> <br />Razorback sucker critical habitat was designated in the following section of the San Juan River <br />Basin (59 FR 13374): <br />New Mexico, San Juan County; and Utah, San Juan County. The San Juan River from the <br />Hogback Diversion in T. 29 N., R. 16 W., section 9, to the full pool elevation at the mouth of <br />Neskahai Canyon on the San Juan arm of Lake Powell in T. 41 S., R. 11 E., section 26. <br /> <br />The Service identified water, physical habitat and the biological environment as primary <br />constituent elements of critical habitat for both Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker. This <br />includes a quantity of water of sufficient quality that is delivered to specific habitats in <br />accordance with a hydrologic regime that is required for the particular life stages of the species. <br />The physical habitat includes areas of the Colorado River system that are inhabited or potentially <br />habitable for use in spawning and feeding or as a nursery, or that serve as corridors between these <br />areas. In addition, oxbows, backwaters and other areas in the 100-year floodplain, which when <br />inundated provide access to spawning, nursery, feeding and rearing habitats, are included. Food <br />supply, predation and competition are also considered important elements of the biological <br />environment. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Pre-Program Consultations <br /> <br />Since 1977, various federal agencies have initiated actions within the upper Colorado River <br />Basin that have required consultation with the Service. Many of these consultations were on <br />actions initiated by the Bureau of Reclamation and the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Consultations in <br />the late 1970's and early 1980's resulted in no jeopardy biological opinions. <br /> <br />Since the early 1980's two major projects have gone through section 7 consultation with the <br />Service. These were the Animas-La Plata Project (ALP) and Navajo Indian Irrigation Project <br />(NIIP). At the time of these consultations, a small reproducing population of Colorado <br />pikeminnow persisted and a population of razorback sucker was documented in the river. During <br />the section 7 consultation for ALP, the importance of the San Juan River population of <br />endangered fish species was reevaluated and it was recognized that the current and cumulative <br />adverse impacts of water development projects were creating conditions in the San Juan River <br />that jeopardized the continued existence of the species. The impacts discussed in the biological <br />opinions for the ALP and the NIlP primarily focused on water depletion and included an analysis <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.